I have been in a role for over a year. The dept has two functions - operations and admin. I do 75% admin and 25% operations. Admin is fairly consistent and can keep one busy throughout the day. Additionally admin staff have to do tenders.
There are many staff including myself who do not take lunch breaks.
There are staff in team who do 95% operations and 5% admin. They are assigned Tenders, but may choose not to do these as operations supposedly gets busy. But I do find that they have time to take long lunches and plenty of catching up breaks during the day. Operations staff also tend to depend a lot on admin staff to complete tenders etc although they have worked here for +3 years.
There are a lot of systems enhancements going on mainly relating to admin and admin staff are constantly being reminded to implement these. The point I made at meeting was that operations staff should also move in line and implement these for their admin portion. I mentioned that with systems enhancements happening, the whole team should be able to move forward but the pressure of implementing new systems disproportionately falls on a few.
I regret saying anything now because I do understand the background of team set up. Manager is of operations background. 90% of talk in any given meeting is relating to operations. He seems to have a more favourable attitude towards Operations staff. He asks only them to fill his yearly review. He never pushes them to learn new skills. He will often assign a task relating to their admin portion to me. He replied in the meeting that he can easily separate the two. Which makes it clear to me that he is biased in his thinking and sees staff split into two categories although on paper we have the same job titles and pay scales.
So I have probably pissed my Manager off . I have probably also upset the operations staff as one of them said they can't do more than their operations portion. So spoke up and gained nothing.