Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Is it rude to refer to someone as a “resource”

17 replies

wpl · 22/11/2023 11:42

I share an office with my manager, so overhear almost all calls. He received a call from his manager. He was giving my manager a task to complete, and then decided it was better if someone lower down the ranks did it. So he told my boss to “use your resource to do it”. For context, he knows other people’s names but evidently forgot mine so decided to call me a “resource”

OP posts:
shepherdsangeldelight · 22/11/2023 11:45

I hate the term "resource" as agree with you that it is dehumanising, but it's a total normal word to use in this context in a business setting, so not rude from this perspective. (And unless you are the only person that can do this particular task using the generic term "resource" means he's not assuming you will do it - just someone in your manager's team).

tootrueblue · 22/11/2023 11:45

Not rude at all, usual business language.

Sherrystrull · 22/11/2023 11:47

As a teacher I say that support staff are the best resource we have. But I would never refer to a person as such. I would use their name or role. It's rude and derogatory.

wpl · 22/11/2023 11:49

I’ve definitely heard “resources” and think that’s fine, but when he clearly had me in mind? Why couldn’t he say use X or my job title

OP posts:
WaitingRoomBoredom · 22/11/2023 12:01

Yes, definitely rude. Also possibly 'normal' for that context but still rude.

SheerLucks · 22/11/2023 12:02

Referring to you specifically as a resource is bloody rude IMO.

Rouleur · 22/11/2023 12:06

I don't like it but unfortunately it has become standard corporate language since Personnel departments got re-branded as "Human Resources" sometime in the 90s.

Monsteraobliqua · 22/11/2023 12:10

I think that was rude as he was talking about a specific person. Coupled with 'use' rather than 'ask'. He could have said 'ask Jane/ your EA to do it'.

WhatNoRaisins · 22/11/2023 12:10

I'm under no illusion that management will just see people like that but to actually hear them say it would annoy me.

ErrolTheDragon · 22/11/2023 12:13

Rouleur · 22/11/2023 12:06

I don't like it but unfortunately it has become standard corporate language since Personnel departments got re-branded as "Human Resources" sometime in the 90s.

Yes, and that was probably not a good change of emphasis.

Lackinginspiration1 · 22/11/2023 12:15

I read it as “skilled person” so don’t see it as an insult or rude at all

Spinet · 22/11/2023 12:17

I think it is rude but he also seems like a bit of a micromanaging dick anyway so wouldn't take it personally. I've been referred to as my boss's 'team' before even though there is only me in it! That's annoying too. But its all just Office Business Industry nonsense isn't it.

Milknosugarta · 22/11/2023 12:17

In work we are all resources of one kind or another, even the management. I wouldn't think it rude, tbh.

wokbun · 22/11/2023 12:19

I think its more polite than saying "use wpl" to use it. It depersonifies it - the manager can choose which underling to use :)

CloudPop · 22/11/2023 12:21

tootrueblue · 22/11/2023 11:45

Not rude at all, usual business language.

Not when describing an individual whose name you know, it isn't. It is widely used when referring to groups of people I agree.

Goldbar · 22/11/2023 12:38

People in general are resources in a business context, but no, I would not refer to a particular person as a "resource" as opposed to "your junior colleague", "what's her name again?", "the dark-haired lady" or some other way of identifying you if they couldn't remember your name.

hiddle · 22/11/2023 20:13

If it is then HR will need a total rebrand.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page