I've worked for 35 years, my work is generally thought to be of a decent standard. I get really good feedback and take any criticism as a chance to improve
I have a new, senior position, which is mostly going well, but 6 times a year I have to prepare papers for board. The content of the papers is easy for me and I haven't had any criticism about that, but goodness it's impossible to get anything right re the layout, formatting, punctuation and turn of phrase.
E.g. I've always anonymised these kinds of papers so I've used job titles not names when referring to individuals. He wants the names in. I understand people may have a preference but does it matter that much, its very clear who is meant?
One document I've copied exactly from the one he approved for the last meeting and he's changed the punctuation in it. Some of the punctuation "corrections" are, in my view, a matter of opinion. E.g. he likes an Oxford comma, I don't.
It's honestly taken me all week to get to a place where I think he might approve the damn papers (100+ pages) writing the content only took a few hours!
He's even asked me to change the style of bullet point used.
Will I get used to his needs and things will improve.....? Please?