I really don't understand the thinking behind trying to ''force'' people back in an office environment.
The past few years have shown that it is perfectly possible to do most of the jobs that were office-based remotely.
People are happier, healthier if they are not wasting hours in commuting and can have a better work-life balance. Companies can save money by not having to pay rent on office space and Pau high utility bills.
So why employers want to push people back in noisy and frankly inefficient office spaces (half the time when I used to work in offices hours were wasted in pointless meetings, backstabbing/office politics, gossiping, talking about what you did over the weekend and making tea...).
Employers keep complaining that they can't recruit staff so why risk losing the ones you have by removing the opportunity of working from home.
Now that people know full well that it is perfectly possible to do a good job at home, they won't simply accept that they should return back into old, rigid system of working in offices.
Companies who offer more flexibility will very likely be better able to recruit and keep good staff.
If my company decided to remove remote working although I was assured when I took the job that the role could be done from home most of the time and flexible working was highlighted as a benefit of the job, I would leave. Because as someone who lives with a long term condition working from home means I can keep working.
For many of us there is no going back to having to be chained to your desk all day just because management can't get past their preconceived ideas of work.