It's all a bit hypothetical because I haven't applied for the job yet, but I've seen the perfect role for me. I tick every box on the person spec and it's also quite a step up. The FTE is significantly more than my current role, but it's PT, 60%. I'd be doing 3 days PW and there'd be very little difference in my take home pay, although I'd be worse off because of the cost of the commute.
It's not a pleasant commute. About an hour on a good day, but involves 3 trains, so plenty of potential for delays etc. In fact I used to do the exact same commute pre DC and was glad to see the back of it. No way I could have done it with young DC.
DC are now adult so I don't have the same ties and work is less about money and more about fulfilment/work life balance for me these days. I'll still be very comfortable financially despite the reduced income and the reduced hours are very appealing, plus the job sounds interesting.
So whilst there's no way I'd consider this commute full time, I'm wondering if it might be OK to do 3 days pw as a pay off for PT hours. There's also a possibility that wfh might be on offer, but I doubt more than one of the three days. I wouldn't want to wfh all the time anyway.
WWYD?