Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Redundancy

30 replies

McNibs · 13/10/2022 16:36

My husband is being made redundant early next year
He was TUPE'd 18 years ago from a civil service contract which offered an enhanced package for voluntary redundancy, as opposed to the compulsory redundancy package. Newer employees are on a different contract without the enhanced package. The current employer is saying they are unable to offer enhanced packages for voluntary over compulsory, and that the amount paid will be the same regardless of if employees volunteer or are made compulsory redundant.

Can anyone advise if they can disregard the terms of his original contract in this way please? His is in the union and is waiting for their advice on the matter.
Thanks in advance.

OP posts:
McNibs · 13/10/2022 22:38

No, same job all that time. No new contracts. No promotions, no changes.

OP posts:
TBOM · 13/10/2022 22:47

McNibs · 13/10/2022 22:38

No, same job all that time. No new contracts. No promotions, no changes.

In which case, unless there is a clause in his new contract which stated an end date to TUPE terms and a set of new terms after the end date, and he signed that contract with such a clause and new terms in it, thereby agreeing to the change, they have to honour his original contract and give the enhanced package even if redundancy is compulsory.

TBOM · 13/10/2022 23:22

McNibs · 13/10/2022 21:16

Quveas thanks for your reply.
His original contract states 'If you were previously turned down for voluntary redundancy then later selected for compulsory redundancy under the linked scheme, you will receive voluntary redundancy terms.'

One thing I should clarify, that clause is specific to the situation of being turned down for voluntary. But that doesn’t impact this circumstance of him I assume volunteering for redundancy because it’s being offered by his employer. The situation would likely be different if there was no voluntary redundancy on offer, depending on what his contract says. So as long as they are offering voluntary, then he should, based on what you’ve shared here, be eligible for enhanced either way.

MsPincher · 16/10/2022 21:17

Floweryflora · 13/10/2022 22:00

It was 18 years ago op, he has a new contract now, cmon you’re smarter than this and you know this, no 0ne is this dim.

This is nonsense. Unless they actually changed his terms (which would be difficult given tupe) he will still be on his original contract.

MsPincher · 16/10/2022 21:24

McNibs · 13/10/2022 21:16

Quveas thanks for your reply.
His original contract states 'If you were previously turned down for voluntary redundancy then later selected for compulsory redundancy under the linked scheme, you will receive voluntary redundancy terms.'

Was there any offer of voluntary redundancy this time though ? I doubt his compulsory redundancy would be considered part of a “linked scheme” to his redundancy offer 18 years ago. Does he have any other contractual redundancy rights?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page