Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Would you mention at interview

32 replies

whywhydeary · 14/07/2022 10:09

I don't know what to do in this case.

I am desperately trying to escape a toxic bullying workplace.

It seems I am the next target after the previous target left.

I wouldn't usually mention anything negative in an interview but what about when the give me a bad reference and I haven't said anything? I will not be able to defend myself and I won't be accepted for the job.

Please help I have been feeling very tearful and depressed.

OP posts:
AhaLyn · 14/07/2022 18:54

*grey rock during notice period I meant

whywhydeary · 14/07/2022 19:18

Thank you Ahalyn but due to lack of confidentiality from an enmeshed management, they will know where I'm going by close of day 🤣

OP posts:
AhaLyn · 14/07/2022 19:22

Oh yes I understand, I just mean talk to them as little as you can get away with etc. Spiteful people are usually insecure or jealous.

Jalisco · 14/07/2022 19:48

Desmondo2021 · 14/07/2022 10:11

They aren't allowed to give a bad reference I don't believe. I think they will only comment on factual things like attendance and any recorded disciplinaries. I wouldn't mention it in the interview. It doesn't add any value at all and it's not the right place. If they come back to you after offering you the job and mention it then you can discuss it then.

Of course an employer can give a bad reference. The reference ought to be truthful but does leave some latitude.

That said I agree that mentioning reasons for leaving at interview should focus on positives - career development, positive company culture etc.

AhaLyn · 14/07/2022 20:07

@Jalisco it isn’t ought to be. It has to be law.

AhaLyn · 14/07/2022 20:08

*by law. Sorry wrapped up due to COVID.

Jalisco · 15/07/2022 13:28

AhaLyn · 14/07/2022 20:07

@Jalisco it isn’t ought to be. It has to be law.

Yes that is what the law says. But as I said, that doesn't exactly pin it down. It is still entirely open to expressing opinion - provided that it is stated as opinion and "evidence" is provided. I am sure that you are aware that damning with faint praise or commenting on subjective performance is still within the law. Oe persons truth is another persons lie. If any manager wants to damn someone in a reference it is very possible to be truthful, "fair" and damning all at the same time. So I will stick with "ought" thanks, because it "ought" to be truthful, but that leaves a lot of wriggle room for the motivated.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page