Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Return to office, different rules

18 replies

Strawberriesdelight · 22/04/2022 13:45

We are now back to work in the office but this doesn't apply to mothers. They can choose office/ WFH. Guess non parents just have to suck it up but is this OK?

OP posts:
LIZS · 22/04/2022 13:47

Sounds discriminatory.

travailtotravel · 22/04/2022 13:49

Yeah, if this is real, I'd be taking that up with HR.

WhatATimeToBeAlive · 22/04/2022 13:50

That is definitely discriminatory and would mightily pee me off.

nearlyspringyay · 22/04/2022 13:59

Yeah, that's bullshit and I cant imagine any company arriving at that as a policy.

Blanketpolicy · 22/04/2022 14:01

Need more context. Are they giving parents more time to re-organise childcare or have parents requested and been approved flexible working?

SamphirethePogoingStickerist · 22/04/2022 14:03

Discriminatory or reasonable adjustment for parents?

Depends how it is worded I suppose.

tomatoandherbs · 22/04/2022 14:07

Let me guess

You haven’t seen once person around since you very recently returned to work
you know that person is a mother
you have put two and two together and made 8

OctopusSay · 22/04/2022 14:10

Everyone has the right to request flexible working. Have you made an application?

TrippinEdBalls · 22/04/2022 14:11

Have they said it doesn't apply to mothers, or are you assuming because the people who you know have been given this flexibility have children? Because those aren't the same thing.

DysmalRadius · 22/04/2022 14:13

No mention of fathers?

Strawberriesdelight · 22/04/2022 15:04

No mention of fathers. Verbally stated mothers are an exception.

OP posts:
bringincrazyback · 22/04/2022 15:17

SamphirethePogoingStickerist · 22/04/2022 14:03

Discriminatory or reasonable adjustment for parents?

Depends how it is worded I suppose.

It's not just mothers who have caring responsibilities.

bringincrazyback · 22/04/2022 15:17

Parents I meant to type, sorry

TrippinEdBalls · 22/04/2022 15:19

Strawberriesdelight · 22/04/2022 15:04

No mention of fathers. Verbally stated mothers are an exception.

Then no, that's not ok. I don't think it's legally discrimination - not being a parent isn't a protected category, though I suppose in this case it is sex discrimination if fathers aren't included - but it is clearly wrong and unreasonable nonetheless.

cornflakedreams · 22/04/2022 15:21

SamphirethePogoingStickerist · 22/04/2022 14:03

Discriminatory or reasonable adjustment for parents?

Depends how it is worded I suppose.

Being a parent is not a disability so reasonable adjustments are not in point.

SamphirethePogoingStickerist · 22/04/2022 15:33

bringincrazyback · 22/04/2022 15:17

It's not just mothers who have caring responsibilities.

That's why I said parents.

Now OP has clarified my answer would be a little bit different.

Covid has made many things more fluid and time out for kids off school, nursery etc is one of them.

There are all sorts of things that are outside the norm being accepted to make lives and business easier.

I'm not a parent and can't get to exorcised by this, except for the assumption of 'mothers'. That I could get annoyed by.

SamphirethePogoingStickerist · 22/04/2022 15:35

cornflakedreams · 22/04/2022 15:21

Being a parent is not a disability so reasonable adjustments are not in point.

????

Reasonable adjustment for covid has less to do with EA2010 than getting businesses back on track.

Or don't we do that any more?

bringincrazyback · 23/04/2022 20:26

That's why I said parents.

@SamphirethePogoingStickerist it looks like you missed it, but I meant to say parents and corrected myself immediately to that effect.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread