Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Contract 'subject to extension'

6 replies

GNfan · 17/03/2021 23:24

Hi all,
Hoping someone can advise. I really appreciated your help with a different issue recently.
I am on a 12 month employment contract, due to end September 1st 2021. The wording in the contract said the job was for twelve months, 'subject to extension', because funding was an issue.
The council have just awarded my employer extra funding and my boss has said "great, so you can stay on til March 2022". She only said this casually in passing, and I didn't reply, it wasn't the time.
My question is... If I don't want to stay beyond September 1st, do I have to resign? Should they offer me a new contract? Or is the assumption that I just stay on, and nothing needs to be put in writing?
It is a super stressful job, so I was kind of looking forward to leaving in September, and trying to find another job/taking a step back (I know this might sound silly in the current climate) so I was curious to know what the contract wording means in practice?
Thank you. I hope that made sense.

OP posts:
flowery · 18/03/2021 00:14

You have two options. You can either tell your boss now that you won’t be accepting any offer of an extension and will be leaving at the end of your current contract.

Or, you can hedge your bets for a while in case you change your mind, and decide later, possibly when you get the extension in writing.

GNfan · 18/03/2021 00:53

Thanks so much @flowery.
And do they have to put something in writing? Could they assume that since the funding has come in, and they said 'subject to extension' that my current contract will automatically extend, without then having to put it in writing?
That actually sounds quite daft written down, I know, but it's quite a disorganised place I work in!

OP posts:
flowery · 18/03/2021 07:23

Well they don’t have to. If they made clear to you verbally that they were extending and you accepted and carried on coming to work that would be ok. Not sensible on their part, but they could.

But what difference does it make? Whether they confirm it in writing or not, at some point you will need to tell them that you will not be staying longer than the end of the existing contract.

GNfan · 18/03/2021 07:42

@flowery Thank you. My contract officially end in September, so I'll discuss with them properly. Your replies are really helpful.

OP posts:
mumonthehill · 18/03/2021 07:46

I have worked on year contracts, charity role, and I was always told in writing if my contract was being extended and for how long. It was normally each year as funding was secured. I would expect both verbal and written.

MrsPinkCock · 18/03/2021 15:40

Legally it depends on what your contract says and how it actually deals with both the fixed term itself, and any notice required.

If the contract terminates automatically on 1 Sept without the need for either party to give notice, they would need to offer you a written contract/letter which you would have to accept to extend the contract. Otherwise, you don’t have to do anything - it just terminates.

If the contract is “until 1 Sept, subject to extension” and that is formalised in that way, there will need to be notice periods included as it isn’t legally certain when the contract ends (although I would say arguably, “subject to extension” would impliedly require the consent of both parties, so it could still terminate automatically.

It really depends on the wording of your contract!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread