I have a question about redundancy pooling, on behalf of a colleague.
They have worked part time for a small organisation for 8 years, in that time their job has changed / evolved to meet the organisation’s needs, (which can be pretty fluid!). On occasion the organisation then created a new post and employed someone to do the role, as there was a bigger demand for that area of work and my colleague returned to their original role or a slightly varied version of it. Difficult to explain but basically they have done bits or all of the other roles at some point during the 8 years.
They have been told yesterday they are at risk of redundancy and consultation is underway. There is another person employed in exactly the same role as them, (same title, JD, tasks), but they are full time and not been there for 2 years yet. The other person has not been put ‘at risk’ and my colleague was told that some of their existing workload would be redistributed to this other person.
There are also several employees, at the same grade, doing posts that my colleague has either done some of or all of the tasks before, or is capable and qualified to do; none of whom are being put ‘at risk’ either.
Is there some justification as part of the consultation for my colleague to challenge the lack of a pool, that at the least includes the other person with exactly the same JD, work and job title and even to ask why the other employees, on the same grade with whom she has interchangeable skills and experience aren’t also included?