Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

HR Professional Opinions Please

8 replies

Jololo · 27/06/2020 19:15

A bit of background, I work for a charity and last year, myself and two colleagues were suspended from work for two months following serious allegations made by short term temp. A full investigation took place, we were all interviewed separately as were our colleagues. As a result, the allegations were found to be false and we could return to work. It was a traumatic time, particularly as we were escorted out of the building in front of our colleagues and were not informed what the allegations were until 48 hours later. I have worked for the charity for two years. No apology has ever been made.
The only element of truth that was proved was that we had given our manager and senior colleague nicknames, they were not discriminatory, neither were they terms of endearment but they were found in emails that we had stupidly sent between us out of pure frustration!
My manager and our senior colleague are forever absent which puts a huge amount of pressure on the rest of us, they are not team players, it is one rule for them etc and it is fair to say that there is a lot of resentment in the team. I had tried to discuss this with my manager’s manager but she wasn’t interested, although she later apologised for not listening when it became clear that we were a dysfunctional team which needed her attention.
Upon our return to work, our seniors ignored us and then each gave us short sharp shrift and made it all about them, how they felt at being given a nickname and not about how being wrongly suspended had affected us. Should a meeting between the 5 of us been facilitated, it might have helped us all clear the air a little, however this never happened. On top of this we came back to a team in complete disarray, NOTHING had been done and it was left to us to play two months catch up!
Shortly afterwards, both our seniors went off (again) with stress for two months. During this time, we ran the team between us well, dealing with Year End etc and had access to higher management who listened to our concerns and promised change. Unfortunately, lockdown happened and our senior members have been allowed to return to work via the back door and nothing has changed. Higher management now have much more important issues to deal with i.e. COVID and the furlough scheme and we have all been thrown to the Lion’s den.
On Friday, I had my Annual Performance Review(APR) which I was dreading. (I had said that I was not comfortable with my manager doing it as A) she had hardly been in the office the previous year and therefore had no idea of my performance B) there was some animosity between us which had not yet been resolved.) However, although during the review she did praise me, I felt it insincere and a very mediocre review. I just wanted to get off the phone. Then at the very last minute she said she was going to refer to my “lapsed professionalism” referring to the emails that had come up as part of the investigation following the suspension “Did I still use the nicknames?” and “Did I regret the emails?”. I was surprised and I asked her not to mention “Lapsed Professionalism” as the suspension was a separate issue, I felt I had been punished enough and had apologised to her for the use of nicknames.
My question is: Surely, only the investigating officer should have had access to my emails and not someone that was involved in the complaint. Her manager told me herself that she had been told not to look through my emails. Is this a breach of confidentiality? I feel that I have not had a fair APR as she could not possibly be objective.
I love my job, I am generally well liked and focus on bringing the income in for the cause. During my manager’s absence, I have taken on the line management of one of her reports as she was clearly not coping. I just feel like she has it in for me and I cannot win. My manager is not liked, I believe that she has Narcissist Personality Disorder, she is passive aggressive, always must get a little dig in (such as in my APR) and many people have left because of her.
My question is: Surely, only the investigating officer should have had access to my emails and not someone that was involved in the complaint. Her manager told me herself that she had been told not to look through my emails. Is this a breach of confidentiality? I feel that I have not had a fair APR as she could not possibly be objective.

OP posts:
flowery · 27/06/2020 22:25

I’m not sure it’s realistic to think that details of an element of a disciplinary procedure that were found to be true would be withheld from your line manager who is doing your appraisal. You’re right that the details shouldn’t be broadcast and other colleagues shouldn’t know. But a person can’t effectively line manage and appraise an employee if they are not allowed to know about this stuff.

Caitlin73 · 27/06/2020 23:05

@flowery

I’m not sure it’s realistic to think that details of an element of a disciplinary procedure that were found to be true would be withheld from your line manager who is doing your appraisal. You’re right that the details shouldn’t be broadcast and other colleagues shouldn’t know. But a person can’t effectively line manage and appraise an employee if they are not allowed to know about this stuff.
Manager is part of complaint though so should not have had access to emails.
flowery · 28/06/2020 12:42

I don’t think there’s anything to necessarily suggest she looked through the emails, but she is obviously aware of the allegations made agains OP in a disciplinary proceedings, and is aware of the ones that were upheld.

Completely unrealistic to think a manager could have a team member subject to a disciplinary hearing without knowing what that team member was accused of and what allegations were upheld.

nextslideplease · 28/06/2020 19:42

Sounds like you were rightly suspended and lucky not to have been fired.

Caitlin73 · 28/06/2020 20:28

Are you a HR Professional? I’m really keen to know on what grounds your opinion is based on only knowing the basic facts. It took the investigating officer months to reach a decision based on evidence which you obviously don’t have access to! 🙄

prh47bridge · 29/06/2020 00:09

Flowery is an HR professional.

The OP has admitted using disparaging nicknames for her manager and a senior colleague. We know this allegation was found to be proven. No other evidence is needed to answer the OP's question. The evidence flowery does not have access to will not change that. It would therefore be surprising if the OP's manager was not told this.

Flowery is not offering an opinion on the other charges against the OP.

Caitlin73 · 29/06/2020 06:47

@prh47bridge

Flowery is an HR professional.

The OP has admitted using disparaging nicknames for her manager and a senior colleague. We know this allegation was found to be proven. No other evidence is needed to answer the OP's question. The evidence flowery does not have access to will not change that. It would therefore be surprising if the OP's manager was not told this.

Flowery is not offering an opinion on the other charges against the OP.

I was referring to nextslideplease's comment. Thank you.
nextslideplease · 29/06/2020 10:16

Yes the disparaging nicknames and the misuse of company systems (emails) to send them.

Depending on your company's grievance process, you could have gotten a warning (which it appears you did get), or you could have been dismissed (it appears this happened within your first 2 years when you would have had less employment rights).

You have been very lucky IMO. Learn from it and move on or move out.

And I say that not just as an HR professional myself but as a trade union rep, who has also been through the employment tribunal process personally.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread