I realise the company are well within their rights to do this, but I was curious as to what extent extenuating circumstances are taken into account should it come to that?
For background, Husband's company are beyond dreadful, losing accounts left right and centre, regular upper management shake ups, redundancies and then re-employment for the same positions but different titles, all a bit dodgy. Our direct issues are as follows:
In September 2019, husband received a written warning. All points raised in the warning were appealed to in writing with supporting evidence to the contrary and supported by the account for which the warning referenced. The appeal was never acknowledged or replied to in any sense.
The company's contract with the account Husband works for states that three levels of management must be employed and on-site in full-time positions, these are a General Manager (husband's position) Events Manager and full time chef. The latter of the two are not filled and therefore husband covers both roles when required.
Husband's company do not pay sick leave at all. If you're ill, it's considered a day's unpaid leave.
any hours worked above and beyond the base rate are not paid nor offered back as time in lieu. Husband regularly works above and beyond these hours.
Husband has received a job offer in his dream role and has requested a one month's notice period to suit the new business. Current company have refused and are threatening court action. Should it come to that, will the above be taken into account? I desperately don't want my husband to miss this opportunity and whilst I would love him to be able just to put two fingers up and turn and leave, I'd like some clarity on what would happen if the worst came to the worst.
Thank you