Hi, firstly I am new to this platform and I am actually asking the question on behalf of my other half as she even finds talking about it too distressing. I was hoping there would be someone who can back up my thoughts on this issue from a legal aspect.
My girlfriend had an extremely distressing miscarriage earlier this year. It required medical intervention and as result she had to have a short period away from work (Just over 2 weeks). Not long at all but she wanted to go back to work as she loved her job and felt it best for her grieving process.
Just over a month after she returned to work, her manager held a meeting where they extended her probation by 3 months due to the occurrences she had sick off as a result of the pregnancy and miscarriage. All sicknesses were documented with the relevant doctors notes attributing her sickness to the pregnancy and the management team was fully aware of her pregnancy, and miscarriage. This meeting was documented (we have a copy) and specifically says this extension is due to the sickness she suffered due to her pregnancy and miscarriage. Also, they said that this sickness would stay on her record for 12 months and she would have to prove herself in the future.
To top it off, she had already passed her probation as detailed in her contract of employment and presumably in turn they should not / could not have extended by a period for any reason.
Having been raised to the companies HR team, their official conclusion is that the manager was implementing the company process, was put down to a training issue and there was no intention to discriminate due to her pregnancy.
I guess my question is has anyone any insight to such a thing happening and what the outcome was, and if anyone believes this does constitute pregnancy discrimination? Thanks in advance.