I'm being made redundant from my part-time position and so will soon be looking for a new job, in charity/higher education sectors, where from experience I know part time working is relatively common. Ideally I'd like to work 3.5 or 4 days per week. But very few jobs are advertised as p/t and obviously finding the 'right' job, with the 'right' hours in the 'right' location is quite a big ask!
My question is - would I be unreasonable to apply for positions that are advertised as full time at organisations whose websites state in general terms that they support flexible working. Then if offered the job to say something along the lines of 'I see that you offer flexible working, I'd be interested in doing this role 4 days a week, and/or with some working from home, compressed hours etc' and try to negotiate something before accepting the role?
Part of me thinks that as these organisations state they are flexible employers, and also that as a 4 day working week is not massively different from 5 days, if I'm the best candidate and so am offered the job, then I'm in a good position to negotiate?
But another part of me thinks that this could come across as cheeky - applying for what is clearly advertised as a full time position and then trying to change it into a different role? And that even if they did agree to the flexibility I'd feel as though I'd gotten things off on the wrong foot
For what it's worth it would be for an office-based, not customer or student facing role, so in that sense I know flexibility is doable in many cases.
I'd really appreciate thoughts from anyone whose been through similar, or from anyone with recruits staff/HR perspectives. Thank you!