Hi employment lawyers I am a regular MNer but have name-changed for this thread.
I have just handed in my notice at work because the job isn't working for me - mainly because of the expensive and unreliable commute and having to be in the office and having family commitments I need to attend to around work. I explained the situation to my boss, but he said that despite the fact that I do an excellent job he won't let me work from home more than I do because he wants to build a team ethos and he can't do that if I am at home. So I resigned.
My questions is: it's a small team and when I am on leave we buy in cover from a freelancer. My notice period expires in January and she will probably cover my work until a replacement is found for me. She has an expensive day rate.
I have asked my boss if I can work more or less entirely from home during my notice period other than when I have meetings. He is probably going to say no but if I simply said I'm doing it anyway he has two choices - he sucks it up or sacks me.
So if he were to sack me, can he argue gross misconduct and refuse to pay the remainder of my notice period? Given that the lady who covers me works 100% from home and never goes into the office at all? Is employment status the deciding factor here? Even if he didn't pay me it would be more expensive to pay my cover (assuming that she is even available) so practically I think it's in his interests to accept my request but I'm wondering what the legal situation is.
I'm not concerned about references as I have other people I can call on. I guess my main concern is not getting paid for the rest of my notice period though it's not an absolute disaster if I don't, I have savings to cover me for a few months.
I am a member of a union so will ask them but just wondered what the MN hive mind thinks.