Hoping someone can offer some advice on here.
I have been working for my company, a charity for 6 years.
For the last 2.5 years have been on a temporary promotion position that for various reasons they're only just getting around to advertising as a permanent role.
I have been told today that the job will be advertised with a live in property as they 'need someone on site' to deal with emergencies.
We already have on call managers that deal with emergencies out of hours.
Background info, they've just employed a manager who will be a grade above me who turned down the property, didn't want to live on site, move their family etc.
Other sites have managers at other sites who want to live on site have been told.no they cant.
Other duty managers have to live within 30mins of site. Some do, some don't again inconsistent working conditions.
Basically lots of inconsistencies with this decision.
To move into the property, we'd have to relocate across town, rent out our own property, my husband would find it difficult for work and my dcs will be starting reception in spwtember at a greta local school. If I move they have no school place and id have to try and find them a place mid term. It would be very difficult.
Where do I stand on this? I feel like I'm being discriminated against because I have a family and cant just up sticks.
There have been other issues at work for me, bullying etc and this just feels like the last straw with a particular manager trying to make my life very difficult.
Any advice please?