This years appraisal/performance review/objective setting has come round and I have a different Line Manger (LMgr) from last time round. It seems he's going for a more everyone-the-same approach rather than previous LMgr who discussed the objectives properly and treated us individually. I can see the merits of this "fair" strategy but
As a result I have a list of 29 objectives and while some overlap that seems excessive to me. I have nothing to compare it to so, MN please tell me what you would view as normal.
Additionally some of the objectives are very poorly written, or not relevant to the work I have been doing so I'll be asking LMgr to change some anyway; wondering whether to push back on the sheer number also.