You missed out three crucial words, bopi
Get your illness linked to pregnancy if it is, that protects you
IF IT IS.
What I'm saying is that if the ops illness is pregnancy caused then she can, and should, be protected. That's the law.
As I said, I've taken only a couple of days in total that were not pregnancy related over the last decade or so.
I work well over my hours. I'm flexible, I go above and beyond, I am certainly not a shirker or a pisstaker.
I also had HG in my pregnancy - the attitude like yours that any time off at all was not to be tolerated meant I worked with no time off, vomiting up to 20 x a day in the office. I fainted in the office and just got up and got on with it. I took many calls just lying on the floor because I knew I'd vomit or pass out. I went for drips in my lunch break (even taking a bloody lunch break was frowned on.)
Eventually I was put in rest leave at six months due to that and some potentially life threatening complications. If I'd been able to rest a bit at the start I'd have been able to work much longer.
People get sick. I'm lucky in that generally I'm healthy and I also have a high bar for staying in bed (never, generally.) but I'm also aware that other people do get ill. I had a colleague hospitalisedfor a week with chickenpox last year. One with cancer, etc etc.
There are always pisstakers, and everyone knows who they are. That's no reason to enforce a culture where people are afraid to take genuine time off for genuine illness - we e fought hard for worker protection in this country, let's be grateful for the protections we have.