CFC,
I don't wish to sound obtuse here here but have problems following your logic.
You say you trained with SMAE, which is fine, but then when I ask where I can see your scope of practice you refer me to either a Google search or the Institute of Chiropody & Podiatry website. Where is your training body, the SMAE Scope of Practice in all this?
The SMAE website says quite clearly that you should expect to be earning £35 for a half hour session, so if that not happening for you perhaps you need to think what you need to do to achieve that level of remuneration?
You quote the instance about seeing a patient so severely disabled they cannot leave the house who needs a CNF. I assume you mean (cut & nail file ?) If it really a CNF then relatives/friends could do this.
However, sadly, serious disabilities do not come alone and the patient with disabilities may have other co-morbidities that need the intervention of a Podiatrist and the patient should approach their NHS Trust to see what help is available.
12/14 weeks for a routine appointment is quite normal for the 70/80 yo group. It would, of course, depend a great deal on the presetning conditions.
You say “I think that if more Pods took FHPs under their wings and helped/guided them it would help the Foot Industry all round.”
I fail to follow your logic. FHPs are trained to be stand-alone practitoners working in the private sector. They take courses that are supposed to give them all the necessary skills to be autonomous sucessful practitioners in the Priavte Sector, so why would they want to be 'guided by a Pod' ??
Just curious.