Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Disciplinary for slamming a door?

29 replies

RonaldMcDonald · 25/05/2015 10:59

Hi

I have been asked to help a young member of staff with a disciplinary meeting.
She is terrified by the process and isn't a member of a union.

She has reportedly slammed a door and an investigation has been carried out with other staff members but not herself and as a result they have called her to a disciplinary meeting.

In the notes presented to her, her boss alludes to problems that she had 10 mths ago that were never formally dealt with ie no warnings etc were given or performance management implemented. He seems to be rolling issues that they had addressed and moved forward from last year into this situation.
He has said that this has put them right back to the beginning of the problems 10 mths ago and that he now cannot trust her to behave 'appropriately'

I was wondering if that is fair and okay for him to do so.
It feels as though these issues are now being taken as an agreed problem that she has failed to address when actually nothing was put in place other than an exploration of each other's pov.

She has been working there for 20 mths and her boss is ex military and has had issues with her 'insubordination'.
She is shy and logical and does not always jump quickly enough when barked at. She can come across as sullen at times and she certainly rubs him up the wrong way. She is a good worker and a v young woman.

Any advice would be very gratefully received

OP posts:
flowery · 26/05/2015 13:54

Oh that's a shame. Not entirely unsurprising though really, from what you've said. It sounds like her face doesn't really fit, and when disciplinary issues arise only a short time before employment rights kick in, employers will be well aware that in a short time it will become very difficult to dismiss the person. Therefore if that is something they think might happen, they may do it now rather than give a warning and then in a few months, wishing they'd taken their opportunity to easily dismiss.

RonaldMcDonald · 26/05/2015 14:35

They seemed very firm about the decision. She's very young, 18.5, and seemed very affected by the whole thing.
I'd doubt she'd appeal but she genuinely thought she was doing well/at least much better. Awful to observe

Two years seems a long time to make a decision about someone, to me, at any rate

OP posts:
ExitPursuedByABear · 26/05/2015 14:48

Oh that's awful. Poor girl.

flowery · 26/05/2015 15:49

IMO if you manage someone well there's no reason you shouldn't be in a position to be sure about someone within a year, or less.

But the law is what it is.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page