I was told on Tuesday by my manager that the annual leave that I was given back in 2008, I was not entitled to. Under the flexible working scheme, I changed my working pattern to part time, which is 3 days a week , school hours, which equals 16.5 pw. Also, term time only. Perfect - or so I've thought for the last few years. I have had 5 new managers in that time and each manager has checked with HR and payroll that I would be entitled to annual leave pro rata for the hours I work. Each one has come back with a yes. This has never been because they have doubted it, but because they each record it differently. I have always been told that the school holidays was unpaid leave, but my annual leave is paid. As this has been the case for years, I have never had reason to question it. I don't work in a school, I work in a local government office. Therefore , conversations with other staff about leave have never come up. I get a new leave card each year, clearly marked with my entitlement on it. So, due to a new system being put in place by HR, it's been apparently flagged up that I shouldn't have had it and now needs to be paid back. They are working out the cost, but it will be thousands. Also, with immediate effect I have no annual leave. My manager feels I should be grateful that I keep my job and that 'nothing has changed financially " for me! I am totally stressed out by it. I can't sleep and I don't know what to do. I am waiting for the union to get back to me. Please can someone help me get things straight in my head as to whether this is allowed? Thanks