I've got interviews for two different jobs next week, one day after the other (eek).
One role is for a local youth charity. Its a 10 minute walk from me, 3 days a week, money not great but I can live on it. The role is a liaison role, working with schools and local authorities to raise awareness of the issue this charity deals with, and would involve making presentations and delivering training o young people and partnership agencies.
The other role is for a much bigger and more high profile organisation. Its full time and would involve a 45 min commute to and from work. Better money. This role is an advocacy and training role, working much more directly with young people on a grittier topic. Much more full on, but the contract is only for 6 months initially, with a view to extension subject to funding.
Obviously, I havent been offered either role (yet! 
), but am just wondering what I should really be going for at this point in my life?
Role 1 - local, part time, very much within my comfort zone, could do school run two days a week
Role 2 - full on, full time, wouldnt ever be able to do school run, exciting area of work, higher status, prob better prospects , better money
Confuzzled.