Hi all,
I am aware this thread is on a very fine line, we are NOT sure yet if we are recruiting, so please do not interpret this as an advertisment
As a dad with a 2yr old girl, I read mumsnet alot! Strangely, my first post is going to be about NON baby stuff.
We are a small business (in the jewellery sector) and thinking about whether to hire a freelance PR or not. We did speak to some reasonably well known agencies, but they were looking at about £30k+ which we just can't afford.
So, we then thought maybe we should look at freelance. The strange thing here was that after meeting a few people and getting rates etc, the only one which seemed decent wanted the equivalent of £360 a day (£1500/month->£18k/yr + bills/expenses), and they were not senior by any stretch of the imagination (maybe 3 yrs of experience).
However, from looking at some threads on here, that figure could be seen as reasonable when comparing to agency. The key questions which spring to mind are:
- Credibility - once someone leaves an agency and works for themselves, surely their punching weight diminishes considerably as they lose the PR company brand name? If not, then what value does a "brand" like Mission Media, or Purple PR bring to the table? If targets are high value like Vogue/GQ etc especially.
- Resources - access to tools like Diary Directory, FeaturesExec etc may be limited (or not?) to a freelancer. If someone wants broad coverage (especially regionals) they would need these right? Do PR freelancers generally have access to these?
Finally, depending on the above, would it not then be better just to pay for the "Resources" (say £2k a year?) and then hire a full time junior PR?
I'm sure there's an element of quality vs quantity, but for £18k, 1 day a week, non office based vs say £22k full time office based (and can help in other areas) I'm struggling to see the value.
Please can some of the PRs out there help with the thought process!!
Thanks,
Nathan