Hi all,
I was hoping someone could help me out with my upcoming meeting about why my flexible working application has been refused.
Its complicated but basically in Jan I went from 4 days to full time, 3 days in the office and 2 wfh on the understanding verbally that if it didn't work out I could go back to 3 days at home as I have done for years. I also took on 2 direct reports.
Last week I took the decision that it wasn't working out and put a formal request in to go back to 3 days at home (I haven't had a formal request since 2003 and then it was 2 days in the office and 2 days at home).
It was granted by my manager and director informally. Now HR have come back and said that they have decided that anyone with over 1 direct report needs to be in the office 3 days a week - I have no problem with that but wasn't told that in Jan and my managers didn't know either. Furthermore it would have affected my decisions then.
So can they have a blanket policy for flexible working and managing or does it all have to be taken on its merits - another person in my team is already working 2 days in the office and managing 2 people but they say that is irrelevant as that was granted before they changed the (unspoken and uncommunicated policy).
Does this also mean that when one of my reports leaves in November (temp contract) I cant then just go back to 3 days out as that would require another flexible working request and I have used mine up iyswim. Although I wouldn't have put the bloody thing in in the first place if I had known the new rule.
Sigh. Sorry for the long post.