I currently work 2 days / 3 days over 2 weeks. Always the same days so it works out to be 2.5 days averaged out per week.
I am at a senior level in a legal job 12 years qualification and obviously part time.
If my employer makes my role redundant and offers me either a similar role which is full time and involves some extra stuff in evenings to meet clients etc I presume I would be able to refuse as my part time role is moving to a full time role.
If though they offer me a job which is again part time but a level way below mine and suitable for a 5 year qualified with a third off my current salary, takes away my bonus prospect and a small profit share arrangement I have and which commits me to 3 days every week rather than 2.5 which also means I would need more childcare than I currently do would I be able to refuse this ?
The thing is that in case scenario no 2 the reality is that the work I would do will not be that dissimilar....it's just that they've realised they can get someone cheaper to do it. They want to keep me there as obviously they then get my experience and also knowledge of current clients but would get me cheaper.
I don't want the role as with childcare and paycut I'll be on about £300 per month....the stress will be worse as the dept is smaller and work pretty much the same so DH and I have agreed that I'll leave...
I only get stat redundancy but don't want to lose out if thye are arguing the toss. They want us to work notice which is fine with me.
what is your view ? I know the 'standard wording' so to speak so wanted a view based on the facts really if you have one !
thanks.