Can anyone advice re the following situation;
I work four fixed, full days a week, Mon-Thurs, equating to 28 hours. Our annual leave entitlement for full time workers is 25 + bank holidays, so I get 20 days.
My organisation has decided that from the coming financial year, with which our annual leave period coincides, we will be added the bank holidays to our total annual leave and will have to book them as days off. The organisation is closed during all bank holidays. This means that bank holidays have been calculated pro-rata. This is apparently to correct an unfair situation where one member of staff working Tues-Fri has been getting paid for more bank holidays than they should.
So for this coming year I will be entitled for 8 bank holidays out of the 10, which covers the days that fall on my working week. From next year, I will not be receiving enough 'bank holidays' allowance and will have to make up the short fall using my 'annual leave' days. Furthermore, a colleague working Tues-Fri will actually gain leave because they will receive exactly the same bank holidays allowance as me, bust since they will only have to book days that fall outside of Mondays, they will not need to use it all up for that purpose.
This strikes me as quite unfair despite it being as per government regulations. I understand why this needs to be this way and it is only fair however, I don't understand why I should lose out where colleague gains. I think no one should lose and no one should gain.
How is that fair for full and for part time workers?
If there is an HR person here that can shed light on this, I'd be grateful.