Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Is this constructive dismissal?

9 replies

blushingm · 10/02/2012 21:25

Dh has worked the the same employer for 18 years. His contract of emplyment states 40 hrs. In 2009 this was cut 'temporarily' to 35 but ended up being permanent. Dh boss has now said if its quiet he will have to have days off unpaid - so some weeks he could end up working 28 hrs and it's impossible for us to survive financially on that. Can his boss do this? Tia for any advice

OP posts:
KenDoddsDadsDog · 10/02/2012 21:32

You can request an amendment to contract. We have all had to take a pay cut recently to prevent redundancies. You don't have to comply though. Does his contract now say 35 hours?

blushingm · 10/02/2012 21:33

No he wasn't given a new contract or anything in writing

OP posts:
KenDoddsDadsDog · 10/02/2012 22:00

Well, his contracted hours of work are still 40 then. and if he doesn't have the 35 hours in writing then think they are already in breach.
Is he thevonlynperson that has been asked to do this or are there others?

ahhhhhpushit · 10/02/2012 22:07

You can no longer do anything about the cut from 40 to 35. This happened three years ago and he continued to work there so the contract was varied by conduct. It doesnt matter it wasnt put in writing. So therefore his contract is for 35 hours.

You say that he has now been told he may only get 28 hours per week. This could potentially be constructive dismissal but he would have to resign pretty sharpish and it is a big risk for the following reasons-

  1. He may already have affirmed the variation by working there for a period of time (how long ago was this change put to him?)

  2. His company may have a genuine business need to make the change (i.e. it's either this or redundancy)

  3. He needs to check his original contract to see if there is a term in there that allows hours to be varied. This has arguably been superceded but it throws another spanner into the works.

  4. Constructive dimissal claims are notoriously difficult at the best of times.

Hope this helps.

blushingm · 10/02/2012 22:18

Hi - he's resigned last week and it was 2 weeks prior to that the new cut came in. He sighted his reason for leaving as the cut in hours and therefore pay. It everyone that has been cut cos the boss says work is slow but I checked their accounts and they are making money year on year

OP posts:
ahhhhhpushit · 10/02/2012 22:20

Well it might be worth making a claim given there are no fees to issue a claim in the tribunal yet. It's risky but it might be worth a shot. Might get them to come up with a settlement offer.

Their accounts mean nothing. The tribunal will not go behind a business decision of a company.

ahhhhhpushit · 10/02/2012 22:21

Also - he will have to show he has attempted to mitigate his loss i.e. apply for lots of jobs.

blushingm · 11/02/2012 09:08

That's push it - I'll discuss with dh all the info you've given - thank you

OP posts:
gettingalifenow · 11/02/2012 09:13

I suggest you get legal advice - its a complicated area and as said already, the speed with which your DH acted after learning the proposal is crucial.

And you can tell nothing by the accounts - their business decision will be based more on a projection than a retrospective statement of the year. And accounts can be very deceptive anyway!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page