Just posted in AIBU, but someone rightly pointed out I should post here. For June/July/August, 13 weeks, employees at my company (800 employees, public company) get to leave at 3pm. Normal leaving hours for Fridays are 5pm, so that is 2 hours off. So, over the three months, that is a total of 26 hours off.
I don't work on Fridays. I work Mon-Thurs. My salary, bonus, public holidays, etc are all 4/5ths of what it was when I was full time. I assumed I would be entitled to some kind of summer concession, to equal 4/5ths of 26 hours, which is 20.8 hours. I sent an email to my HR rep today asking if they'd decided what to do about summer hours for those not working Fridays (there are several mums in the office on a reduced schedule.)
My HR team's response, via an official "summer hours Q&A" she attached to an email:
'Q: What happens if I don?t work on a Friday?
A: Lucky you! That's just one of those things unfortunately; you won't be able to carry over to another day."
However the Q&A says they ARE going to make concessions for people who are unable to leave early on Fridays because of their duties. So, they are making some adjustments.
AIBU to think this is not right? (And to be annoyed at the language they used, ie "Lucky you!" Anyone not working Fridays probably have kids and ARE working their butts off that day, at home!)
It almost sounds like that question on the Q&A was for those taking a Friday holiday. But I was quite clear in my email that I was asking about my reduced schedule, and this is the document she sent back. I'll go into the office tomorrow to clarify, but it would be great to know more about any legal standards or just general HR best practice that might apply!
Thanks in advance.