I already posted this on the "going back to work"-forum, but now thought that perhaps it would be more appropriate here..
"I'm not sure if this is the correct forum to seek advice on, but I noticed that there were a few solicitors on the board and I was hoping to get some thoughts on my dilemma..
I'm currently 22 weeks pregnant with my first baby and currently doing two jobs working fulltime in a non-legal role and part-time for a publishing company doing legal research. I completed a law degree last summer and came pretty close to securing a training contract with a City firm last autumn, but unfortunately I wasn't picked after the final assessment centre
.
Now, having been unsuccesful at securing a training contract, I'm wondering if I should be applying for one now that I'm pregnant and clearly showing or if I should wait until the baby is born. Of course I'm well aware of how tuff the competition is out there, so perhaps I shouldn't even worry about this, as the chances of getting a interview in the first place are very slim. But I was hoping someone could give me some insight as to what the general attitudes within City firms are towards mature applicants, who already have children, or who like myself, are about to have them.
In an interview they couldn't (or at least shouldn't) of course formally ask me about it, but I'm afraid showing up at an interview heavily pregnant would just automatically disqualify me in their eyes.. At the same time I wouldn't want to wait almost another year again to apply, as I'm not exactly getting any younger
and I know I will not be able to add any value to my CV whilst on maternity leave.
Also, while I ultimately want to work in the private sector and in a more commercial setting, I am also concerned about how I could realistically begin my career in such an environment and work such long hours with a young child. Any comments on this as well would be much appreciated.
Oh, and sorry about the rant
...