Dh works for a mental health charity full time. He is contracted to 40 hours a week and this is flexible with regards to start/end times.
Recently he has been doing a lot of training for which the company expect him to pay for his transport (very often very expensive train journeys) on the day and they won't reimburse him until the next month for all travel incurred, so very often we are losing £100 a month on travel for him - money we can ill-afford. We do get it back the next onth, but often the training is at the end of the month and it's getting to the stage now where he won't pay the council tax because he knows he has this travel money to spend!
DH is a nice kinda guy - never one to rock the boat and even though we have had to borrow money off several people to cover the travel this month he still won't say anything. He claims if he is skint and tells the company then they will give him a loan of £50 which he would have to pay back when he leaves the company (which I don't understand as they pay for the transport in the end when they reimburse him - therefore they pay for the train ticket anyway? It makes no sense to me).
I am hugely pg and prob pretty hormonal(so please be kind) but it's starting to piss me off - I think dh should contact his head office and at least ask for the rules to be changed and explain the situation the company are putting us in. It makes more sense - they book the tickets in advance for the training that they know has to be done - advance tickets mean that they save money rather than reimbursing dh for his 'on the day' more expensive tickets, plus when it comes down to paying a bill or buying food (yes this happened at the weekend!!) dh won't have to keep this money for travel or borrow off others. (They also expected him to pay for a service user to go with him this time - yep that's another £30 for trains for some guy - we are basically, as a family, taking the financial burden for this company by paying for their service users to go with dh).He did say he couldn't afford to do this, so company paid for the guys ticket there and then - why couldn't they do this for dh?
AIBU to think that the company should take responsibility for the travel that they are supposed to reimburse?
He also has to take service users to activities and pay for them himself until he is reimbursed a month later. I have no idea how much is spent on this per week, but it's getting to the stage where he has stopped telling me because he knows I have issues with it. I wouldn't mind if it was the end of the week they got their expenses back, or on the day! But it really does mount up by the end of the month - and he never seems to know for sure when he is getting it back.
He doesn't get paid a lot for what he does and we really do struggle sometimes so that his 'service users' can go for a bloody game of snooker or a tai chi class!
I feel like writing to the company myself and explaining what they are doing to us (don't worry I won't, I'm not daft)as I know dh will never say a word and carry on doing the do.
Please tell me I am right in feeling that the company are not altogether right in doing this?