DH worked for Company A. During his time there, he applied for a Flexible Working Agreement, reducing his contract to a 0.8 contract, 4 days per week, with a specific day off, and was granted. We have 3 children under 5, one of them receives DLA, and it was for this reason the request was granted.
Company B bought Company A, Company B is a substantially larger company than A, and have very different working practices. Overtime (and lots of it) is the norm, and generally speaking, they expect their employees to do whatever they request. Contracts don't seem to matter much to them.
DH is being put under huge pressure to rescind his FWA. Lots of questions about when he will be able to go back to a 5 day week (he went through the official procedure at Company A, and has a permanent contractual change). Lots of comments about how awkward his 4 day week makes things, etc.
But today, he felt threatened. He had asked for leave this week (we had been offered a free holiday by a charity, who were willing to make the premesis safe and give 1:1 support for DD1, so that we could go, but it was specifically this week). His request was denied because one other driver was off this week. Fair enough, that's life.
Then, his manager asked him to work all of this week because that other person was off. DH agreed, but his contract specifies that if he works a full week for operational reasons, he is compensated by an additional day off in leiu the following week. His manager knew that DH was on leave on 2 days next week, so gave him the day before his usual day off, to total 4 days off. Additionally, DH was asked to start work an hour early on 2 consecutive Mondays, to fill in for another colleague. Again, DH agreed. He asked to shift his hours completely on the first Monday, so working an hour earlier and leaving an hour earlier. But the second Monday, the manager gave him too much work, so he was forced to do an hour overtime.
So, today, his manager's mangager asked him if he would mind changing his day off (that he had been allocated in leiu of the day he worked this week) for one the following week. DH said that he couldn't, as it was DD2's birthday that week, and we had already made plans. The manager then repeated his request, and DH said again, that we had already planned for that day, and unfortunately he was unable to change it. The manager asked a further 2 times, in different ways, and DH reiterated that plans had been made. The manager then said "I believe I have asked you reasonably and with good notice" (Today is Friday, the day to swap is Tuesday). DH again apologised for not being able to accomodate his wishes. The manager then said "Well in that case I will have to see what I can do this end. This flexible working seems to be all one way at the moment."
DH is feeling very bullied. From his perspective, he has been asked to work an additional day on the week that he was denied our one chance of a family holiday, and asked to work early on 2 days (7 am start) in the last two weeks. He has agreed to all of this. Yet, he is being told that he is not being flexible enough. The company knows that he has a disabled daughter, yet they imply that he is getting a 'day off' in excess of other employees. They don't seem to recognise that he is also being paid 0.8 of the wage.
Tonight, he has had a text message asking him to start early on Monday, because they have an issue with the vans. Does he have to agree? Isn't it a bit off to get a very short text message asking him to work early? It makes life very hard beacause DD1 is very active, and it means that I lose an hour's support and sleep. We get little enough as it is. We get no respite.
To be honest, I am starting to think that DH would have a case for Sex Descrimination. Thousands of women up and down the country work part time. Why is he being treated badly for working a 4 day week?