Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Unmarried couples to gain property rights and possible wider implications

111 replies

MsGreying · 06/06/2026 15:58

Unmarried people to gain rights to partner's property
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/millions-of-unmarried-couples-to-get-stronger-rights

Whilst a simple glance makes it sound appealing I think this has serious consequences.

There's a 10 week consultant from Friday

Millions of unmarried couples to get stronger rights

Overdue reforms to protect women and meet the needs of modern relationships as the government continues to prioritise tackling VAWG and working people

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/millions-of-unmarried-couples-to-get-stronger-rights

OP posts:
AngleofRepose · Yesterday 18:22

Howcool · Yesterday 18:20

GRA was passed in 2004 when Blair was PM.

Yes, I understand that, was just asking senua if that was what they were referring to.

Howcool · Yesterday 18:31

AngleofRepose · Yesterday 18:22

Yes, I understand that, was just asking senua if that was what they were referring to.

I wasn't aware of it at the time but looking back that allowed all the subsequent overreach by Stonewall et al.

ACynicalDad · Yesterday 18:32

In theory this is the right thing to do, but I think the drafting will be vital to making it work and ensuring it's not a complete shit show. I'd be particularly keen to see protections when one partner has contributed and they have kids and have effectively been common law married. Cheeky CL don't need any cover. I suspect Jess Philips was behind the drafting and she will have done it with protecting vulnerable women at front of mind.

senua · Yesterday 18:38

AngleofRepose · Yesterday 18:22

Yes, I understand that, was just asking senua if that was what they were referring to.

Of course.Confused
And don't call me 'they'.

AngleofRepose · Yesterday 18:44

senua · Yesterday 18:38

Of course.Confused
And don't call me 'they'.

Apologies, wasn't meant as an insult, just that some posters are men, and I didn't want to assume.

RaininSummer · Yesterday 18:48

I agree. Just educate people as I do not want my partner having rights over the house I paid off shortly after he moved in out of my wages alone and which I continue to maintain financially without his input. This is the main reason I do not get married so don't take me choices away because others don't do their research.

Error404FucksNotFound · Yesterday 18:56

Lakesfun · Yesterday 15:30

Would it be very cynical to notice that is is being discussed at a time in history when more unmarried women are finally starting to accumulate assets?

Yeah. Funny that, isnt it?

IonianNerveGrip · Yesterday 19:05

Said this on the other thread too, but I'm generally mistrustful of any discussion on this subject that focuses only on marriage giving people rights, and doesn't mention that it also takes them away. The status quo means unmarried cohabitants also have rights that married ones don't, generally about their assets, and those rights are clearly very important to some of them.

However we do it, we're going to end up with some people who are disadvantaged. I'm not persuaded that creating a different set of problems to the ones that exist now is necessarily going to be an improvement.

QuintadosMalvados · Yesterday 19:58

ACynicalDad · Yesterday 18:32

In theory this is the right thing to do, but I think the drafting will be vital to making it work and ensuring it's not a complete shit show. I'd be particularly keen to see protections when one partner has contributed and they have kids and have effectively been common law married. Cheeky CL don't need any cover. I suspect Jess Philips was behind the drafting and she will have done it with protecting vulnerable women at front of mind.

It's not the right thing to do.
And it won't be drafted properly.
There is also no such thing as common law marriage.

QuintadosMalvados · Yesterday 19:59

Error404FucksNotFound · Yesterday 18:56

Yeah. Funny that, isnt it?

Yeah.
And all done under the guise of 'protecting' women too.
Cheeky feckers.

BendoftheBeginning · Today 09:02

QuintadosMalvados · Yesterday 19:58

It's not the right thing to do.
And it won't be drafted properly.
There is also no such thing as common law marriage.

Are you going to feed back on the consultation? I’m sorry to keep banging on about this, but when we fed back our concerns on on self ID we made even Maria Miller pause to reconsider, and that was the start of the that government and the ones that followed changing their minds.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread