Trustees urged to show robust decision making in sex and gender debates

[MsGreying]

https://www.civilsociety.co.uk/news/trustees-must-show-robust-decision-making-amid-trans-inclusion-debate-conference-told.html

Robust decision making required

Oliver noted that some groups “have interpreted the decision as a ban on trans people using single-sex spaces and services and, more generally, an erosion of trans rights”.

Eh?
Ffs

I was [foolishly] thinking that this might have been in the wake of Scope cancelling a choir because of the WORIADS, non-choir-related opinions of just one member - a call for trustees of charities like Scope to ensure that they continue doing what they were set up to do, and are not hi-jacked by trans activists as vehicles for their extreme and arguably illegal words and actions.

I was wrong. But at least the author agrees that GC people have rights too, which is an improvement!

That's actually not bad at all. But where she says that there is an obligation on employers to provide separate toilet facilities for men and for women, but no obligation on employers to police them, I think she needs to talk about what should happen if men use the women's toilet and that comes to the employer's attention.

The fear that trans people might lose rights they never had.

The Stonewall Force is strong.