Interesting video. I hope it gets wider exposure. For those who just want a summary, here's my effort:
The YouTuber runs a small security firm, which gets a lot of work from Brighton nightclubs because there are not too many firms who will handle them. He's been doing this since before the trans explosion.
Remarking on the 'trans' clientele, he splits them into four segments:
- Female transitioners (trans men, who are biological women). He says they're never any trouble.
- Gay, effeminate males. He does a bit of inaccurate diagnosis on them but says, I think correctly, that these are the 'trans women' everyone wants to help and support. He says there are very few of these and they just want to be left to do their thing.
- Drag queens. He portrays these as prone to huge bitch-fights, while also saying they're humorous with it and make up again afterwards.
- Masculine 'women'. He says these are trouble, aggressive, entitled, and often to be found harassing and sexually assaulting women in the toilets. They're the majority of the trans clientele.
He also says lesbians are quite uncomfortable in mixed clubs, feeling the gay men make them unwelcome and the masculine trans women pressure them sexually.
He makes a reasonable assessment of how and why Stonewall pivoted, how it achieved 'untouchable' status for these trans women, and the vast swathes of professionals making similar observations but unable to state their cases. He mentions the issues associated with trans women in female prisons, relating this back to what's happening in the clubs:
[21:47] Biological males that are transitioned to women are many many times more likely to be uh violent sex offenders than just an average straight male. So, they are highly represented in very unpleasant areas.
And I don't think that's because becoming trans turns you into a dangerous predator. I think it's the reverse.
Like I've just said, I think it's because dangerous predators are attracted to put themselves under the banner of trans because it gives them protection. It gives them a kind of cloak of invisibility and it protects them from criticism and they can operate and do what they want and they can almost get away with it.
That's the danger of refusing to have any open conversation on this subject is that you're aiding those people. You know,
[22:42] there are predators who are doing exactly that. And our refusal to have open conversations in this subject matter and being shut down and having people screaming in your face and saying you're not allowed to talk about that. You're just aiding and abetting a bunch of violent, disgusting perverts.
And that's also damaging for the trans community because who's really suffering? We've got the victims of the crimes that are suffering, but also no one's really protecting the actual trans community.
Because if you really are trans because you've got hormonal issues or whatever it is and you truly are trans, do you really want those kind of people ingressing into your community and bringing it into dispute? Of course, you wouldn't want that. [23:28]
To conclude:
[26:53] Some of you may believe what I've just said is some sort of extreme view. Well, I think you should readjust your viewpoint. This is not an extreme view. Taking security of everyone seriously is not an extremist viewpoint. It's just called taking security seriously.
You know, I'm not some political uh ideologue. I just care about people being safe. And that that's why I did the job I did because I cared about people being safe. And you can uh take that however you want. Thanks for watching. Have a great weekend. I'll catch you next time.