Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Boots prescribing hormones privately, relying on a "technically it's legal" defence.

10 replies

singthing · 04/04/2026 16:31

Boots selling trans drugs despite NHS fears over harm to children
Pharmacy chain says it dispenses with ‘extreme caution’ and only to those with legally valid prescriptions
Boots is allowing the sale of trans drugs to under-18s despite the NHS warning about their effects on children.

Britain’s biggest high-street chemist is among a handful of pharmacy chains filling out private prescriptions for oestrogen and testosterone for 16 and 17-year-olds.

These cross-sex hormones, which transgender people take to change their physical appearance, are classed as controlled drugs and can cause permanent infertility.

Last month, the health service halted new NHS prescriptions of the medications for under-18s, citing “limited evidence about safety, risks, benefits and outcomes”.

GPs were also told that they “should refuse” to work with private, unregulated gender clinics issuing prescriptions to 16 and 17-year-olds.

The most popular gender clinics for under-18s are based overseas and outside UK regulation. The NHS said these clinics “pose a risk to patient safety as they are not subject to the same level of scrutiny as registered services”.

NHS bosses cautioned family doctors against collaborating with two clinics, GenderGP and Anne Healthcare, which oppose the Government’s 2024 puberty blocker ban.

However, The Telegraph has learned that under-18s turned away by their GP can still obtain cross-sex hormones via private prescriptions dispensed on the high street.

Boots, which operates more than 1,700 in-store pharmacies, and Rowlands Pharmacy, which has 331 branches, told The Telegraph that they continued to supply the drugs.

Boots said its pharmacists provided “compassionate, inclusive and person-centred care” to individuals with “legally valid” prescriptions for cross-sex hormones.

Rowlands said it had “always” dispensed the prescriptions “with extreme caution and sensitivity” and had procedures in place “to support pharmacists when handling prescriptions issued in EU and EEA countries”.

Some concerned parents told The Telegraph that they were “enraged” by Boots, as one of Britain’s most trusted brands, supplying the medications.

Boots ‘facilitating sterilisation’
One mother, who asked not to be named to protect her child, said her 17-year-old daughter had first obtained testosterone from Boots at 15 and had continued filling private prescriptions there until last summer. The script was issued by Gender GP.

She said: “As if my daughter pumping wrong-sex hormones prescribed by a disgraced, online, unregulated provider into her perfect, beautiful body wasn’t bad enough, I then discovered that her prescriptions had been dispensed by a branch of Boots the chemist in our home town. This revelation quite possibly enraged me more than the prescriptions themselves.”

The mother said that while she believed “[n]obody with any common sense thinks that GenderGP is a reputable company”, she expected more of the high street stalwart where she used to buy her daughter’s “nappies, baby food and cute Mini Mode outfits”.

“Our beloved, national treasure is facilitating the sterilisation and harm of my vulnerable, same-sex attracted, confused daughter and turning her into a lifelong medical patient. She may well be irreversibly harmed by these hormones and will almost certainly never be able to have children of her own,” she said.

It is understood that Boots cannot comment on individual cases.

Dr Louise Irvine, a GP on the gender-critical Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender, said pharmacies such as Boots could still dispense the drugs because the law had “not caught up” with the updated NHS stance. She said ministers had not “extended the ban to private providers [as it did with puberty blockers] but will almost certainly do so.”

In the meantime, it remains both legal and compliant with guidance from the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC), which regulates the industry, for pharmacists to supply these drugs to 16 and 17-year-olds with a valid private prescription.

Other chains have imposed blanket bans
However, The Telegraph can reveal that three major supermarket pharmacy chains – Tesco, Asda and Morrisons, which operate 680 pharmacies between them – have imposed blanket bans on dispensing cross-sex hormones to under-18s, reflecting uncertainty in the sector about how such prescriptions should be handled.

Industry sources said pharmacies might have proactively decided this in response to the changing NHS rhetoric, and also because some felt that it was impossible for pharmacists to carry out all the checks on these prescriptions that the regulator requires.

When dispensing cross-sex hormones to 16 and 17-year-olds, the GPhC says pharmacists must consider “whether a prescription is clinically appropriate”, take a “holistic view” of the patient, obtain informed consent, assess safeguarding concerns and ideally secure GP contact details.

They must also ensure that the prescriber has sufficient expertise to assess, diagnose and treat gender dysphoria, while pharmacies are expected to verify that overseas clinics comply with “relevant UK regulatory and professional guidance”.

Some clinicians feel pharmacists are between a rock and a hard place, as their regulator also tells them to weigh “any risks that might be associated with declining to make a supply or abruptly discontinuing to make a supply”.

Neither Boots nor Rowlands Pharmacy would say whether they fill prescriptions from Gender GP or Anne Healthcare, the two companies singled out for criticism by the NHS. It is understood that Tesco, Morrisons and Asda would not fill scripts from these clinics as they do not supply cross-sex hormones to under-18s.

Superdrug’s position is less clear. A spokesman said it followed the law and current regulatory requirements but did not clarify its stance on supplying cross-sex hormones to under-18s.

The GPhC is monitoring the situation and keeping its guidance “under review”.

Anne Healthcare said it “facilitates access to gender-affirming care, connecting patients with qualified, experienced clinicians who follow WPATH [World Professional Association for Transgender Health] international best practice guidelines and robust safeguarding processes”.

A spokesman for Boots added that its pharmacists “consider the full context of the patient’s circumstances when deciding whether it is clinically appropriate to dispense the prescription, in accordance with the guidelines from the General Pharmaceutical Council”.

Rowlands Pharmacy added that its pharmacists are encouraged “to discuss prescriptions of this nature with the patient to assure themselves that the medicines have been prescribed appropriately and will be taken correctly” and for “pharmacists and pharmacy teams to seek advice and guidance as appropriate”.

Gender GP was contacted for comment.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/04/boots-selling-trans-drugs-harm-to-children-fears-nhs/
https://archive.ph/iPIy1

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/04/boots-selling-trans-drugs-harm-to-children-fears-nhs

OP posts:
OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 04/04/2026 16:35

'Compassionately and inclusively' medically harming children.

What a total fuck up ministers of all parties have created. And are failing to do anything about.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 04/04/2026 16:37

They're happy enough to police females seeking to obtain the MAP or contraceptives if they feel like it (DD was refused her prescription for menorrhagia unless I collected it - which could have been catastrophic had it been a vulnerable under 16 needing contraception). But this? Oh, that's fine.

PaterPower · 04/04/2026 21:13

”A spokesman for Boots added that its pharmacists “consider the full context of the patient’s circumstances when deciding whether it is clinically appropriate to dispense the prescription”

And how, exactly, do they “consider the full extent” in a 5-10 minute window of contact with one of these children? I would love to understand the actual scope of this.

Because if they’re genuinely getting the “full context” before filling the prescriptions, then they’re doing a lot more than, (according to testimony I’ve read), at least one of the two prescribers named in the article.

It surprises me that Boots decided to take such a risk with their reputation. Where’s the upside? Maybe a few thousand quid in prescription charges, nationwide, vs the negative publicity and the potential to be sued by patients in a few years’ time. Stonewall rankings aren’t worth what they used to be.

tinkerella1 · 04/04/2026 22:36

Boots don’t consider anything when dispensing. It’s just cash.

My daughter is over 18. Went to a dodgy gender dr and got a prescription dispensed by Boots. Despite being underweight and with family history that should say it’s dangerous. The NHS GP said no but the Gender ghouls will take your money no real questions asked. Fundamentally Boots should stop working with all Gender Drs. They’re dangerous and don’t follow guidelines of any kind. They hide behind whatever an 18 yr old says - and they’ve been coached on Reddit and Discord.
Its such a crazy drugs racket dressed up a human right to fuck up your body before you’re old enough to realise.

PaterPower · 05/04/2026 07:28

“Boots don’t consider anything when dispensing. It’s just cash.”

But that’s going to be tiny for such a relatively small number of children. They get to keep any margin they can make on their buy price vs the NHS tariff, plus a small dispensing fee.

Minuscule amounts for a firm with a pharmacy turnover of 2.3 billion.

ApplebyArrows · 05/04/2026 08:38

Not good but I would tend to think the bigger part of the problem is the doctors writing the prescriptions in the first place, and the fact that apparently nothing is being done to stop them?

KnottyAuty · 05/04/2026 09:24

This is unbelievable!

Years ago when breastfeeding DS I got thrush in the breast. Nasty. It could have been the end of the feeding - so I went to Boots to buy an over the counter thrush tablet and when asked I was honest about why I wanted it. The pharmacist refused to serve me because the drug was not licensed for breastfeeding mothers.

The woman was completely unyielding and unsympathetic. I was devastated (although fortunately managed to sort things out another way and was able to keep feeding).

So Im amazed to hear that Boots are now dolling out life altering and harmful banned drugs to minors in a “sensitive” way. FFS

tinkerella1 · 05/04/2026 11:39

ApplebyArrows · 05/04/2026 08:38

Not good but I would tend to think the bigger part of the problem is the doctors writing the prescriptions in the first place, and the fact that apparently nothing is being done to stop them?

There’s enough evidence that these private clinics aren’t acting in the best interests of their patients and Boots shouldn’t accept the prescriptions.

The “shared care” arrangement is also a dodgy practice. Kids learn how to say what they want from Reddit. Get one private appointment then they are directed to a compliant GP who will do shared care.
No NHS practice should be operating shared care on Cross Sex Hormones. Whatever the age of the patient.

And Boots shouldn’t accept not be accepting prescriptions on the basis of the poor clinical judgement of all those involved in “Gender Care”

All prescribers should take a look at the posts on Reddit to see how these kids game the system.

KnottyAuty · 05/04/2026 14:36

tinkerella1 · 05/04/2026 11:39

There’s enough evidence that these private clinics aren’t acting in the best interests of their patients and Boots shouldn’t accept the prescriptions.

The “shared care” arrangement is also a dodgy practice. Kids learn how to say what they want from Reddit. Get one private appointment then they are directed to a compliant GP who will do shared care.
No NHS practice should be operating shared care on Cross Sex Hormones. Whatever the age of the patient.

And Boots shouldn’t accept not be accepting prescriptions on the basis of the poor clinical judgement of all those involved in “Gender Care”

All prescribers should take a look at the posts on Reddit to see how these kids game the system.

If you can get shared care with a gp by saying something specific can someone tell me what the magic words are?!? DS got in just before they stopped accepting ADHD but DD is locked out…

tinkerella1 · 05/04/2026 14:57

KnottyAuty · 05/04/2026 14:36

If you can get shared care with a gp by saying something specific can someone tell me what the magic words are?!? DS got in just before they stopped accepting ADHD but DD is locked out…

It only really works if you say the magic words “I am Trans” and suddenly all manner of drugs not open to anyone else gets doled out. Thats if the GP still believes the bullshit that if they don’t give all the drugs requested the person will not survive.
Its remarkable how the medical industry will give these drugs but if someone went in and said “I want OxyContin and this is why” they wouldn’t and recommend psychiatric assessments.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page