The sheer gall!

[Niminy]

Came across this by accident on a well-known TIM’s public Facebook page.

”we must be victims! Everyone is horrid to us!’

The absolute gall of it. That is all.

Deirdre McCloskey used to post under articles in the Times some years ago when they were leading the media in breaking through the #nodebate demands. A mix of respectful debate with some exasperation that women were challenging any of this.

Bingo

I think Jan Morris wasn’t all about trans.

These men have no idea how much we’d really rather not be thinking about them at all.

Didn’t Morris get the zeal of the recently converted and a ‘woman’ was the be all and end all? it think I remember reading an interview with one of the sons

Oh that’s interesting. He always seemed to be referenced when people, often men, were bemoaning modern trans activism, as an example of a transsexual who continued with his life.

If it's Sophie Grace Chappell, don't forget that he stated publicly that a slight uptick in the number of women murdered and assaulted was a price worth paying for trans inclusion in women's spaces.

Jan Morris did just continue with his life. Evidently he treated his family badly. He had his wife waiting on him hand & foot. He was entirely selfish like all these middle age men who claim they are "trans". His daughter Suki Morys talks about her father in this article in the Times headlined

Jan Morris was a trans pioneer — and a cruel parent

https://archive.ph/bupdZ

Oh yes I know he was awful. No different to all the other men, he just maybe didn’t make trans his raison d’etre.

I suppose he’s lived his life and had adventure , and then wanted to be the centre of attention in a different way. Was there much travel writing after the transition, or just fetishised womanhood?

“Trans philosophers” 🤣 like “trans women” then.

They're identifying as philosophers.

@Ohfuckrucksack I don't think SGC would take kindly to living in a barrel. He might get his spinny skirts dirty or crumpled.

SGC? Oh... this one?

“On this particular issue of safety concerns raised when gender recognition acts are introduced, so a lot of this looks much more to me like anecdotes than data. It’s not like there’s a body of hard evidence that lots and lots of stuff is happening which is really bad. There’s the odd anecdote.”
and
“Suppose people were saying ‘Well you know if you make it easier for gay people to be themselves in society there’s going to be a crime wave or dreadful homosexual murders are going to happen, it’s going to be awful if we do that’, I think we’d rightly dismiss that as scaremongering and we’d say ‘No it doesn’t matter, it doesn’t matter’. It wouldn’t matter, actually, if there was a slight spike in those statistics because this isn’t about that kind of issue.”

A Week in the War on Women: Monday 20th September - Sunday 26th September (substack.com)

There is a link to the radio interview on this substack. I remember listening to it myself and felt shocked. This was referring to deaths and harms of women and girls because he felt that the 'safety issues' should be dismissed.

I mean Chappell was an advisor to BPAC too!