A really excellent opinion piece by Nimco Ali, from The Five Foundation, which works to end FGM, is in today's Times. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/one-lesson-of-october-7-apparently-rape-isnt-always-rape-ccglsdhzl https://archive.ph/84yld#selection-1509.74-1509.137 She is drawing parallels between feminist campaigners' failures to acknowledge the rape and sexual violence against Jewish women on October 7 with the diminishing of FGM:
But, as a black woman who has spent years challenging the way violence against women is sometimes softened or excused in the name of culture or politics, I have seen this selectivity before. For years some activists insisted on framing FGM as a “cultural practice” that simply required understanding rather than calling it what it is: violence against girls.
There are also obvious parallels (which she doesn't go into) with Muslim rape gangs and crimes by men who say they are women - both also get downplayed/ ignored because it's not politically expedient, to the extent that in the BBC's reporting of male violence against a woman just this week, it can be impossible to tell who the man is.
So-called liberal feminist movements have really failed all women by their cowardice in the face of male violence by the 'wrong' kind of men - she makes this point so much better than me here:
For years activists have repeated the slogan “Believe women”, but principles mean nothing if they collapse when the victims are Jewish. If the rape of Israeli women can be denied, questioned or ignored because it is politically inconvenient, then every woman in every conflict zone is less safe.
Because the message to the world’s warlords and terrorists becomes clear. Rape is still a weapon. And sometimes the world will look away.
I wonder if women will ever recover from this, tbh - the ability just to name male violence, because if we can't name it, how can we ever challenge it? It feels like the world has taken a really depressing step back over this... be good to know what others think.