Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Cri­ti­cism as ‘Left-wing trans act­iv­ist appoin­ted to anti-jobs reg­u­lator’

14 replies

IwantToRetire · 14/03/2026 22:04

I suspect the contamination from Stonewall will last for decades.

Not only in terms of whole generations who have grown up thinking Stonewall Law is the Law, but all the cronies who will go on back scratching each other.

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-express/20260310/281887304809252

PressReader.com - Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions

Digital newsstand featuring 7000+ of the world’s most popular newspapers & magazines. Enjoy unlimited reading on up to 5 devices with 7-day free trial.

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-express/20260310/281887304809252

OP posts:
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 15/03/2026 04:05

It all seems like blatant cronyism and job creation, all the 'in crowd' giving all the made up jobs to the 'in crowd', all of the time. No wonder this country's economy is in free fall and it's productivity is minus. 🤢

SionnachRuadh · 15/03/2026 13:56

The true evil genius of Tony Blair was to shift enormous amounts of what used to be political decision making over to "neutral" quangos and regulators that all turn out to be staffed by ideologues.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 15/03/2026 14:25

SionnachRuadh · 15/03/2026 13:56

The true evil genius of Tony Blair was to shift enormous amounts of what used to be political decision making over to "neutral" quangos and regulators that all turn out to be staffed by ideologues.

Who unfortunately in court frequently turn out to be people you would not send to run a lemonade stand and would never function in the real working world.

MarieDeGournay · 15/03/2026 17:39

I read the article and I find that she has become Chief Executive of The Fair Work Agency, not something called 'The Anti-Jobs Regulator.'!

I then looked that up and found that the Fair Work Agency is an Executive Agency of the Department for Business and Trade, and
The Fair Work Agency will consolidate enforcement of rights including National Minimum Wage, agency worker protections, and gangmaster licencing.
'Anti-Jobs Regulator' - mislealding or what?🙄

If Lisa Pinney is the suitable person to oversee the Agency, good luck to her.
If her pro-trans views mean that she isn't doing the job fairly, that'll be the time to complain about her.

But as far as I can see, she applied for the job, went through the selection process and was deemed to be the best candidate.

IwantToRetire · 15/03/2026 19:17

But as far as I can see, she applied for the job, went through the selection process and was deemed to be the best candidate.

On one level this would seem right and proper.

But on the other hand it is in the public domain, and Government of all people should be aware, that Stonewall created a false campaign that implied to those who paid for their training that self id was legally recognised, and that someone who had a GRC became the same and should be treated as the same of someone whose sex was biological rather than the "legal" sex that a GRC confers.

Quite a serious malpractice to just over look.

Particularly in relation to work regulations.

OP posts:
POWNewcastleEastWallsend · 15/03/2026 22:35

IwantToRetire · 15/03/2026 19:17

But as far as I can see, she applied for the job, went through the selection process and was deemed to be the best candidate.

On one level this would seem right and proper.

But on the other hand it is in the public domain, and Government of all people should be aware, that Stonewall created a false campaign that implied to those who paid for their training that self id was legally recognised, and that someone who had a GRC became the same and should be treated as the same of someone whose sex was biological rather than the "legal" sex that a GRC confers.

Quite a serious malpractice to just over look.

Particularly in relation to work regulations.

But as far as I can see, she applied for the job, went through the selection process and was deemed to be the best candidate.

Which is what I think most of us are concerned about.

What were the criteria for
a) determining that she was selected for interview and
b) deeming her to be the best candidate?

Lessons from the C-suite: Lisa Pinney, CEO of the Coal Authority
17 August 2020

My proudest achievement was... when I helped lead a transformation at the Environment Agency from a very technical organisation that ignored some uncomfortable truths, like homophobia, gender bias and other aspects of diversity to one which has been in the Stonewall Workplace Equality Index for 13 consecutive year.

What I’m reading right now… Trans Britain – Our Journey from the Shadows, edited by Christine Burns.

https://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/content/features/lessons-from-the-c-suite-lisa-pinney-ceo-of-the-coal-authority

Celebrating LGBT+ History Month
Lisa Pinney, 27 February 2018

(Trans, "proud lesbian, feminist and trans ally", trans, no debate, trans women of colour, trans, murdered just for existing, more trans, Mermaids, Stonewall, intersectionality, inclusion, . . . nothing about LGB)

https://environmentagency.blog.gov.uk/2018/02/27/celebrating-lgbt-history-month/

TempestTost · 15/03/2026 23:09

The underlying issue is really not this woman, it's that these are the people running our institutions, and they have very little accountability.

The fact that they swirl around from one gig to another is another issue that is fucking the government and the charitable sector.

It's also imo tied in why these seem to be the people running schools, the civil service, and the medical system.

It's a massive problem for a functioning democracy and I think the pp is right to call out the change that Tony Blair made. Not to point the finger, it's done and dusted, and much the same thing has happened in many other western countries, so it's really not about Blair.

But why and how has this happened, we need to understand how it undermines the functions of liberal democracy, and figure out how to fix it.

POWNewcastleEastWallsend · 16/03/2026 01:30

Factsheet: The Fair Work Agency

What changes has the Act made to the law?

The Fair Work Agency (FWA) will be an Executive Agency of the Department for Business and Trade(DBT), created administratively. It will not have its own distinct legal identity, so the Act gives theSecretary of State a series of functions to enforce certain employment legislation. Those functions will in practice be discharged through the FWA, including by enforcement officers appointed by the Secretary of State.

The FWA bring together existing state enforcement functions and, over time, take on enforcement of a wider range of employment rights. This will be a single place where workers and employers can turn for help. It will improve efficiency by ensuring there is one leadership team to oversee work in line with a unified strategy. The FWA will aim to resolve issues upstream by supporting employers that want to comply with the law. But it will also have strong powers to investigate and take action against businesses that flout the law, to level the playing field for compliant businesses.

The Act confers a single set of powers to investigate and take action against businesses that do not comply with the law. These are based on powers of the existing enforcement bodies as well as new powers to ensure the FWA has the tools it needs to enforce its wider remit. These include:

• Powers to inspect workplaces and require employers to produce relevant documents and evidence to demonstrate compliance with employment law, based on powers the existing bodies have.

• A civil penalty regime (based on the National Minimum Wage Act 1998) – where enforcement officers find that employers have underpaid their workers, they will be able to issue Notices of Underpayment that require the employer to pay workers their due and pay a penalty to government.

• A civil proceedings power – the power to bring proceedings in the employment tribunal on a worker’s behalf, and to offer legal advice and assistance where someone is, or may be, party to civil legal cases related to employment or trade union law.

• An enforcement regime in respect of labour market criminal offences (based on the Labour Market Enforcement regime in the Immigration Act 2016) - this involves voluntary Labour Market Enforcement Undertakings and compulsory Labour Market Enforcement Orders that require employers to correct their behaviour. Breach of a Labour Market Enforcement Order is an offence that can result in fines or imprisonment.

• Cost recovery - the Secretary of State will be able to set out, in regulations, how the Fair Work Agency can impose charges to recover enforcement costs from employers against whom enforcement action has been taken for non-compliance.

How is this different from the previous legislation?

Most employment rights are currently enforced by individuals presenting a complaint to an Employment Tribunal. A more limited number of employment rights are enforced by the state on workers’ behalf – such as the national minimum wage or protections for agency workers. The current system of state enforcement is fragmented and inefficient. This complicates the process for both workers and employers seeking help and means many workers are unable to enforce their rights, resulting in certain breaches, like underpayments, going unchallenged.

The Act brings together existing state enforcement functions, as well as functions relating to Holiday Pay and Statutory Sick Pay (which will be implemented in later stages) and includes a power for the Secretary of State to make affirmative regulations to expand the remit of the state enforcement functions to include other employment legislation. The Secretary of State must obtain consent of the relevant Northern Ireland department before exercising this power in relation to legislation that is transferred for Northern Ireland.

The FWA will bring together the functions of the Gangmaster and Labour Abuse Authority, the Director of Labour Market Enforcement, the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate, and HMRC’s National Minimum Wage Unit. The Act therefore provides for the transfer of these bodies’ functions to the FWA and for their removal from the statute book. The Act also requires the Secretary of State to create an advisory board with a social partnership model: equal representation from businesses, trade unions, and independent experts, which will provide advice to the FWA.

When will these changes come into force?

Measure: Establishment of the Fair Work Agency
Expected Commencement: April 2026

What further detail will be consulted on and when?

The Employment Rights Act is the first phase of delivering the Fair Work Agency. The Government will set out further details including timescales for implementation in due course. Once in place, the FWA will be a strong, recognisable single brand so workers know where to go for help. The FWA will take a balanced approach to upholding workers’ rights. The FWA will provide better support to businesses on how to comply with the law and will take tough action against rogue employers who exploit their workers. That is fair for workers, and fair for businesses too.

Implementation will be done in phases following Royal Assent, and we will publish details of our approach to implementation in due course.

Key Stats

The Resolution Foundation estimates that 900,000 UK workers per year have their holiday pay withheld, valuing around £2.1bn (£2,300 each). 1

Research by the Resolution Foundation found that more than 1-in-10 of the lowest-paid workers report that they receive no paid holiday, four-times higher than the highest-paid.2

The Low Pay Commission estimates that 19.4% of workers paid at or around the wage floor were underpaid the minimum wage in 2024 (around 371,000 employee jobs).3

1 Enforce for Good, Resolution Foundation (2023)
2 Enforce for Good, Resolution Foundation (2023)
3 Compliance and Enforcement of the National Minimum Wage in 2024, Low Pay Commission (2024)

Common questions

What employment rights will the FWA enforce?

The FWA will have a more ambitious remit that goes further than the previous ‘single enforcement body’ proposal. It will take on enforcing domestic agency rules, the minimum wage, licensing standards for gangmasters and certain aspects of the Modern Slavery Act 2015. In time, it will also take on additional rights such as holiday pay and statutory sick pay. As mentioned above, there will be flexibility to bring in additional legislation as new challenges emerge.

How will the FWA be kept accountable for doing its job?

The Employment Rights Act requires us to produce an annual report on the work of the FWA and an enforcement strategy every three years. Both the reports and strategies, as well as any updates, must be published and must be laid in Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly. They will be subject to parliamentary scrutiny in the usual way.

When will the FWA actually be up and running?

Implementation will be done in phases following Royal Assent, starting with establishing the body in April 2026, bringing together the existing enforcement bodies and functions. We will publish details of our further approach to implementation in due course.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696126a5d6532b76df7dcd75/fair-work-agency-factsheet.pdf

Igmum · 16/03/2026 08:22

This looks like a body that could take on GC ETs etc on workers’ behalf and provide a powerful voice to support the SC judgement - with a woman at the helm who might choose not to do that because it clashes with her religious beliefs. Can we lobby it to take on these cases? At least she reports to the DBT so presumably the Minister could rebuke/replace her.

MarieDeGournay · 16/03/2026 08:49

I take on board that Lisa Pinney has a questionable work record, what with Stonewall and all, and I'd be watching her like a hawk for any signs that she was letting her opinions stand in the way of doing a good job in the FWA.

She may have changed her thinking in the years since she was with Stonewall, she may have had some of the extreme edges knocked off, she may have studied legal decisions like the Supreme Court ruling and adjusted her thinking, or at least her professional approach, accordingly.

Any disputes around workplace regs/single sex provision would be a real test of her professionalism and objectivity.

I do understand where some posters are coming from, but shouldn't she be given a chance to do the job properly, regardless of her pro-trans beliefs, which she is entitled to hold - completely wrong opinions, in my opinion, obviously, but does 'having the wrong beliefs' mean she can't perform this new job competently?

LeftieRightsHoarder · 16/03/2026 09:36

MarieDeGournay · 16/03/2026 08:49

I take on board that Lisa Pinney has a questionable work record, what with Stonewall and all, and I'd be watching her like a hawk for any signs that she was letting her opinions stand in the way of doing a good job in the FWA.

She may have changed her thinking in the years since she was with Stonewall, she may have had some of the extreme edges knocked off, she may have studied legal decisions like the Supreme Court ruling and adjusted her thinking, or at least her professional approach, accordingly.

Any disputes around workplace regs/single sex provision would be a real test of her professionalism and objectivity.

I do understand where some posters are coming from, but shouldn't she be given a chance to do the job properly, regardless of her pro-trans beliefs, which she is entitled to hold - completely wrong opinions, in my opinion, obviously, but does 'having the wrong beliefs' mean she can't perform this new job competently?

It’s not about the pro-trans views, though, but about Stonewall’s dishonest attitude to the law.

Years of advising companies to ‘go beyond the law’ in empowering trans employees (by breaching female employees’ rights), and supporting law-breaking employers in industrial tribunals.

Not someone I would trust to consolidate workers’ rights!

TempestTost · 16/03/2026 09:38

MarieDeGournay · 16/03/2026 08:49

I take on board that Lisa Pinney has a questionable work record, what with Stonewall and all, and I'd be watching her like a hawk for any signs that she was letting her opinions stand in the way of doing a good job in the FWA.

She may have changed her thinking in the years since she was with Stonewall, she may have had some of the extreme edges knocked off, she may have studied legal decisions like the Supreme Court ruling and adjusted her thinking, or at least her professional approach, accordingly.

Any disputes around workplace regs/single sex provision would be a real test of her professionalism and objectivity.

I do understand where some posters are coming from, but shouldn't she be given a chance to do the job properly, regardless of her pro-trans beliefs, which she is entitled to hold - completely wrong opinions, in my opinion, obviously, but does 'having the wrong beliefs' mean she can't perform this new job competently?

I think if we were to take the approach, people with the wrong beliefs can't hold important political positions, we'd be doing something just as bad in its own way as what is going on now.

Actually it's something I have noticed from time to time as GI is coming under more scrutiny, a tendency among those who reject it to basically take the mirror approach of trying to vilify and suppress people with different political views.

It's something to be careful about I think..

KvotheTheBloodless · 16/03/2026 09:39

MarieDeGournay · 15/03/2026 17:39

I read the article and I find that she has become Chief Executive of The Fair Work Agency, not something called 'The Anti-Jobs Regulator.'!

I then looked that up and found that the Fair Work Agency is an Executive Agency of the Department for Business and Trade, and
The Fair Work Agency will consolidate enforcement of rights including National Minimum Wage, agency worker protections, and gangmaster licencing.
'Anti-Jobs Regulator' - mislealding or what?🙄

If Lisa Pinney is the suitable person to oversee the Agency, good luck to her.
If her pro-trans views mean that she isn't doing the job fairly, that'll be the time to complain about her.

But as far as I can see, she applied for the job, went through the selection process and was deemed to be the best candidate.

I agree with this.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 16/03/2026 17:12

TempestTost · 16/03/2026 09:38

I think if we were to take the approach, people with the wrong beliefs can't hold important political positions, we'd be doing something just as bad in its own way as what is going on now.

Actually it's something I have noticed from time to time as GI is coming under more scrutiny, a tendency among those who reject it to basically take the mirror approach of trying to vilify and suppress people with different political views.

It's something to be careful about I think..

You have a point but I'd think this is less about 'wrong beliefs' than falling into the territory of incompatibility with public duty.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page