🤨 < is this a ‘no sh*t, Sherlock’ face?
I think the next step should be acknowledging private mixed sex spaces are less safe and healthy so we need to work out ways to make them better for times when there’s no alternative (if you are non-ambulant, in a cafe, on a train). Accessible toilets should have a lot more investment.
Adding more mixed sex spaces retrospectively down unsuitable corridors could cause more problems than it solves (if that is what the EHRC are implying as a solution). We have lost around 40% of council run toilets since 2000 as they cost so much to maintain and are sites for sex, drugs, and vandalism. They have to be planned, designed and located so carefully to work.
As a side, British Transport Police couldn’t tell me how many sexual assaults and rapes happened in train carriage toilets as the location is just listed at train carriage. They couldn’t tell me much under the FOI request as it would take them too many hours to sift through over 9000 incidents on trains and in stations. Which is understandable but frustrating. People have found similar with ‘hospital ward’ location - it’s too vague. We need better data collection and collation to reduce VAWG. Police reports need to be more descriptive about location so we can ‘design out’ crimes such as sexual assault, rape and hidden camera placement and try and prevent more deaths (drug overdoses, self harm, cardiac arrests, brain injuries, choking) in toilets.
My research going back to reading court reports and trying to find information about the design of each toilet room or cubicle incident, is long and laborious. But it is clear: single sex design has the ability to save lives and prevent misuse.