We will prosecute any medical professional or anyone in ANY position of authority who has deliberately mutilated a young child in the name of gender ideology.

[SingleSexSpacesInSchools]

I do like someone who speaks their mind, clearly.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DUiPrqDYHD/

Restore - Rupert Lowe

"Important news. The sick puberty blocking trial has been stopped, for now.

A real win for everyone who has campaigned against it.

Our petition sent a strong message, but it is definitely not enough.

Restore Britain is clear here. We will prosecute any medical professional or anyone in ANY position of authority who has deliberately mutilated a young child in the name of gender ideology.

That will apply retrospectively.

We must keep this filth away from young children. We are sending a message that will hopefully make them think twice now.

Well done to all involved who have fought this - particularly James Esses and Rosie Duffield.

Heroes.

A good win. But the fight has just begun."

(FWIW Rupert says plenty of things I agree with, so does Zack , I hold a spectrum of views and I refuse to get involved in the polarising omnicause attitude both "sides" appear to have)

I am however, for reasons that may be clear if you have followed my exploits, not to mention the ones I have not yet shared, a single cause voter. ... not that they're going to win in Brighton...

I’d urge 25 at least tbh.

Retrospective legislation does exist, although it is exceedingly rare. There are some examples here: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06454/SN06454.pdf including some criminal legislation.

They imposed retrospective legislation recently to extend liability periods for Grenfell-type issues, so it does happen.

Nobody's asking for 100% agreement. I don't think there's anyone in Parliament whose opinions entirely coincide with mine.

But there's only one MP who has chosen to surround himself with white nationalists.

Why are you pretending that there's something uniquely great about Lowe on transgenderism that we should ignore all the other stuff and amplify him?

I don't know why you think this is real.. he doesn't believe it and he won't ever have a consensus to make this retroactive... Literal pie in the sky. And if anyone abandons good sense to vote for these bigots because you like this one issue, then you get what you voted for. Seriously, it's the oldest game in the book.. pick at the scabs of the smallest issue and pretend there is a consensus and it is just common sense... He has no expertise in this area and isn't even qualifed to make the claim. These people are the smallest and most marginalized group of people and maybe we should be talking to them about what works... Also research, through research and then let's discuss it without all the hyperbole. If you know anyone who is trans, you will know what a slow and torturous experience of it is to get any medical intervention along the gender affirming lines... It's just not that simple at all. And given that most on this thread reject even the idea it is possible that anyone is even trans, maybe we should be talking to the doctors who work in this field and trans people themselves.

Smallest and most marginalised?

Talk to the trans people?

yes we have seen that in action https://www.transbashback.com/manifesto.html

of course yes to quality research. Every time they do some another gaping hole in this nonsense appears.

let's discuss it without all the hyperbole.

It's been discussed plenty of times without hyperbole and 'trans' and their ally's won't accept it because the discussion always ends up with them not getting their way. There is no one with expertise in this area because this area is entirely made up. The Dr's who support this are being driven by ideology not medical science so there's no reason why anyone should discuss it with them. RL is just as 'qualified' as any of them.

RL is showing those in charge that most of the people in the country don't want any of this GI crap forced onto them, and as the people in charge are the one's doing the forcing, they're the one's who need to be shown.

RL doesn't stand a snowball in hell's chance of getting anywhere politically, but he is helping to highlight issues that the powers that be want swept under the rug, so he has value as far as I'm concerned.

Nobody is saying that it can’t be done or hasn’t been done. The link you provide gives many explanations to show why it’s a dangerous thing to do.

Can’t put it better than Lord Pannick, with whom I by no means always agree: retrospective legislation ”offends against a basic constitutional principle
that people should be penalised only for contravening what was at the time of their act or omission a valid legal requirement.”

The War Crimes Act 1991? It was retrospective in jurisdiction, but the offences were already crimes against international law, and war crimes as established by the Nuremberg trials.

Now, as far as Rupert's head of policy goes... remember the old saying that, when a sentence goes "I'm not saying XYZ, but..." you can ignore everything before the "but"?

Hilariously, the replies to this tweet contain a few Reform supporters going "what are you smoking Harrison", but are overwhelmingly people going "you weakling cuck, Nazism wasn't evil really". Pitt, like the other young men around Lowe, thinks it's a clever strategy to show some leg to literal neo-nazis while putting in a bit of rhetorical throat-clearing so he can present himself as mainstream enough to get invited onto GB News. I don't think this is sustainable.

As for Lowe, you hire Harrison Pitt, you get a Harrison Pitt audience.

Christ, Martin Sellner. Really?

I'm all for taking wins where you can get them and I'm not usually a person who piles on regarding people's associations.

Antisemitism and far right racism are not something you can dismiss with "anyway...." though well done for giving it a go

It's not coming up in the thumbnail, but Pitt's first sentence in the tweet reads:

"Nazism was a great evil, but so is the post-war overcorrection to Nazism: the malicious replacement of European peoples around the world."

That's a direct quote. Ladies, I give you Rupert Lowe's head of policy.

Good god, where does he get them? Bronze Age Pervert's follower list?

Anyway.

They might have more of a sense of humour if they came from BAP. There's a whole backstory to where these jokers have come from, but the short version is that, when Lowe fell out with Farage, he became a magnet for everyone else who had fallen out with Farage over the years. Because Lowe is an egomaniac, he thought these young men were all gravitating to him because he's such an impressive leader, and it never occurred to him that Farage might have had good reason for blackballing Carl Benjamin and his mates from ever joining Reform.

That's why I see Restore as a bigger-budget remake of what happened to UKIP in 2018-19 under Gerard Batten's leadership. The moral of the story is, if you allow Carl Benjamin to join your party, it will be dead within 12 months.

Aren't you going to defend your hero?

the malicious replacement of European peoples around the world."

Well it's not like it hasn't happen before, where do think the English came from. 😂

Fair comment.
We could do with a UK-focused podcast in the vein of Blocked & Reported meets Decoding The Gurus to bring more sunshine to Sargon, the poundshop BAP, his orbiters, those he orbits, & all the space junk between.

I could probably write an account of the Swindon Topman Gang, but I sometimes feel you would need to do it in the style of one of those Evelyn Waugh novels where all the characters are so ghastly you're just waiting for their comeuppance.

This is the kickstarter for which I havebeen waiting.

There's definitely a loopiness to the story that would defy straight journalism.

Even in the matter of how they came to attach themselves to Lowe, who if you x-rayed his brain is basically Generic Tory Backbencher circa 1986. Lowe becoming figurehead of a far right movement is a bit like Barry Gardiner getting kicked out of Labour and accidentally becoming leader of the CPGB (M-L).

I would genuinely love to read this

Shades of Withnail and I - becoming a far right leader by accident 😂

I’m sure there are lots of people reading this thread who secretly like everything Rupert Lowe himself says but dare not admit it to the chorus of virtue signallers. Good on you, SingleSex.

Nobody would believe the true story. Discords full of gay Oswald Mosley impersonators, that's all I'm saying.

😂😂😂😂😂