Oh. Thanks for that. I hadn’t gone through it, and now think I may need to correct title. Hmm. Maybe I’ll just do correction here.
I see they mention child. Why not immature/juvenile individual? Or non adult individual? I also see that ‘fetus’ is used instead of foetus. Why not womb dwelling individual?
Page 3: 74, ‘mother-child linkage’.
Page 8: 229, ‘both the mother and the fetus’ (sic).
Page 21, ‘These studies include mother and infant’.
Page 21 (mother-infant pair studies).
Page 22: 623, using paired samples from mothers and their breastfed infant’ (sic).
Page 22: 628, ‘considerations for benefit-risk for both mother and the child.
Page 22: 643, ‘potential benefits for mother and infant’.
Page 23: 673, ‘health outcomes of mother and baby’.
Page 23: 675, ‘other medical conditions of the mother or infant’.
Page 24: 687, ‘when both the mother and infant are exposed’.
Page 27: 768, ‘exposure risk to the mother and infant’.
Page 27: 769, ‘mother and infant’.
Page 27: 780, ‘mother’s milk, and condition of their infant’.
Ok, I’ve found 13 mentions of mother. Haven’t done appendices. In these examples, mother seems to be only ever used when they mention the offspring, or milk for the offspring. I don’t see where an adult human female is given any dignity or respect of correct language.