Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Uber ordered to pay $8.5 million in trial over driver sex assault claims

4 replies

CuiBon0 · 06/02/2026 12:23

I hope this leads rideshare companies to better protect their riders. Women especially are so vulnerable. I'm glad the jury didn't buy Uber's argument that it wasn't responsible for the driver because he's an independent contractor, not an employee.

During the trial, plaintiff's attorney argued that Uber was aware of a wave of sexual assaults committed by its drivers, but had failed to take basic actions to improve the safety of its riders. Critics have made similar claims for years, drawing headlines and congressional scrutiny.

"A U.S. jury ordered Uber to pay $8.5 million after finding it liable in a lawsuit brought by a woman who said she was sexually assaulted by a driver when she was 19, a verdict that could influence thousands of similar cases against the ride-hailing company.

The ride-hailing giant has long maintained that it is not liable for the misconduct of drivers on its platform, whom it classifies as independent contractors, not employees. But the jury rejected that defense, providing a road map for more than 3,000 pending sexual assault and sexual misconduct lawsuits that accuse the company of systemic safety failures.

This is the first trial in the multidistrict litigation brought in February 2024 in the Northern District of California against Uber Technologies, Inc., consolidating numerous claims from among the more than 3,000 sexual assault lawsuits filed against the company in state and federal courts. The lawsuits allege Uber prioritized growth over safety by using inadequate background checks, skipping in-person driver vetting, and failing to invest in preventive measures such as cameras or monitoring systems. It also claims Uber knowingly put vulnerable passengers, such as intoxicated women, at risk through its marketing and business practices.

https://archive.is/5wF6Z

OP posts:
HildegardP · 06/02/2026 22:25

Good. Uber is a loathesome outfit.

dreichluver · 07/02/2026 02:02

CuiBon0 · 06/02/2026 12:23

I hope this leads rideshare companies to better protect their riders. Women especially are so vulnerable. I'm glad the jury didn't buy Uber's argument that it wasn't responsible for the driver because he's an independent contractor, not an employee.

During the trial, plaintiff's attorney argued that Uber was aware of a wave of sexual assaults committed by its drivers, but had failed to take basic actions to improve the safety of its riders. Critics have made similar claims for years, drawing headlines and congressional scrutiny.

"A U.S. jury ordered Uber to pay $8.5 million after finding it liable in a lawsuit brought by a woman who said she was sexually assaulted by a driver when she was 19, a verdict that could influence thousands of similar cases against the ride-hailing company.

The ride-hailing giant has long maintained that it is not liable for the misconduct of drivers on its platform, whom it classifies as independent contractors, not employees. But the jury rejected that defense, providing a road map for more than 3,000 pending sexual assault and sexual misconduct lawsuits that accuse the company of systemic safety failures.

This is the first trial in the multidistrict litigation brought in February 2024 in the Northern District of California against Uber Technologies, Inc., consolidating numerous claims from among the more than 3,000 sexual assault lawsuits filed against the company in state and federal courts. The lawsuits allege Uber prioritized growth over safety by using inadequate background checks, skipping in-person driver vetting, and failing to invest in preventive measures such as cameras or monitoring systems. It also claims Uber knowingly put vulnerable passengers, such as intoxicated women, at risk through its marketing and business practices.

https://archive.is/5wF6Z

A great result. $8.5 million should give Uber some pause.

Of course in this country a plaintiff would be lucky to receive a few thousand in cash and a Nando's gift voucher.

CuiBon0 · 07/02/2026 07:13

dreichluver · 07/02/2026 02:02

A great result. $8.5 million should give Uber some pause.

Of course in this country a plaintiff would be lucky to receive a few thousand in cash and a Nando's gift voucher.

It will especially give Uber pause because there are more than 3,000 consolidated lawsuits against Uber just in US federal court, plus many in state courts. (Over 500 in California alone.)

from the NY Times
Ms. Dean’s case is a bellwether in federal court proceedings that have consolidated thousands the sexual assault lawsuits against Uber, allowing for certain procedural matters to be presented before the same judge while each case is tried individually. The verdict is not binding on the other cases, but it offered a “real-world test” of the arguments in front of a jury, said Nora Freeman Engstrom, a professor at Stanford Law School.

“Bellwethers give both sides — and the public — a chance to see whether the litigation truly has legs,” she said."

Do you think if Uber is forced to implement more safety measures, will other rideshares like Bolt will do the same?

OP posts:
DeborahVance · 07/02/2026 07:22

Excellent news

New posts on this thread. Refresh page