Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
7
Helleofabore · 25/01/2026 12:04

I agree. I do understand why the many reason there are no other groups, and if there are small private groups they are very private.

The thing is that the harm being done seems to be unquestioned by those supporting those extremists.

Seethlaw · 25/01/2026 11:57

Helleofabore · 25/01/2026 11:47

I understand. I also understand it must be frustrating to you to not find a group that supports you and your needs.

In saying that though, there also doesn’t seem to be an underground group that sends out communication to MPs etc where they would have their identities protected that alerts MPs that there are people with transgender identities with needs not represented by the extremists.

Hmm, good point!

Of course, if such a group existed, and it were sufficiently underground, then by definition we wouldn't know about it ;) But I'm more of the opinion that it probably doesn't exist. I can see several reasons for that, starting with all the reasons why I myself am not involved politically, but none of this changes the fact that non-TRA trans people don't make their voices heard, and that's a problem, I agree.

Helleofabore · 25/01/2026 11:47

Seethlaw · 25/01/2026 11:28

TRAs are just as vicious towards trans people who don't conform to their narrative, as they are with non-trans people. Creating a trans support group that wouldn't support the official trans orthodoxy would be a risky endeavour. To my knowledge, there doesn't exist such a group in my country, for example. I looked for one recently, and didn't find any. Literally all the support groups parrotted the TRAs' lines, with no deviations. The only collective which goes against the grain is so small, it's literally a couple of people, so way too small to establish any kind of support group.

Those groups have allowed a sub section of extreme transgender rights activists to control the public discussion for too long.

It's the other way around: the support groups are built around the TRAs, or at least around their credo. Makes sense, too: imagine I created a support group whose mission would be, "To help people questioning their gender identify what's working wrong in their head". Not only would nobody want to join such a group, but I'd be attacked for open transphobia by the TRAs. My group would be dead before it even had a chance to exist.

So, yeah, basically, no trans support group fights the TRA narrative because no trans support group can exist if it fights the TRA narrative. It's frustrating, and I've been trying to find a fault in that circular logic, but so far I'm stumped.

I understand. I also understand it must be frustrating to you to not find a group that supports you and your needs.

In saying that though, there also doesn’t seem to be an underground group that sends out communication to MPs etc where they would have their identities protected that alerts MPs that there are people with transgender identities with needs not represented by the extremists.

Seethlaw · 25/01/2026 11:28

Helleofabore · 25/01/2026 09:34

I wonder when transgender support groups will start to truly support people with gender identities and stop creating this fear of persecution in any decision that seeks to uphold the needs for society on the basis of sex class. Any group that isn’t publicly saying people with transgender identities are not experiencing genocide, and there are times when sex is important to be prioritised for female people and that male people should not feel it is a personal attack on them when organisations, and society as a whole, does this is feeding this situation.

Those groups have allowed a sub section of extreme transgender rights activists to control the public discussion for too long. We have been told that they are not representative of the larger transgender population. Yet there is no alternative groups out there disrupting this ‘genocide’ and ‘persecution’ discussion.

Of course some people are going to believe that they face genocide and seek asylum. Many of them have said they would do just that, or use language like ‘fleeing’ the USA. And enough people supported and applauded them for saying so.

The fact that they don’t face genocide and that they just aren’t getting their demands fulfilled quite the way they demanded is conveniently ignored. Still, this hyperbolic language has greatly contributed to these men seeking refugee status.

I expect they choose the Nederlands because they all know about the ‘Dutch protocol’ and maybe to them the Nederlands is at the forefront of centring men with transgender identities to get exactly as they want.

TRAs are just as vicious towards trans people who don't conform to their narrative, as they are with non-trans people. Creating a trans support group that wouldn't support the official trans orthodoxy would be a risky endeavour. To my knowledge, there doesn't exist such a group in my country, for example. I looked for one recently, and didn't find any. Literally all the support groups parrotted the TRAs' lines, with no deviations. The only collective which goes against the grain is so small, it's literally a couple of people, so way too small to establish any kind of support group.

Those groups have allowed a sub section of extreme transgender rights activists to control the public discussion for too long.

It's the other way around: the support groups are built around the TRAs, or at least around their credo. Makes sense, too: imagine I created a support group whose mission would be, "To help people questioning their gender identify what's working wrong in their head". Not only would nobody want to join such a group, but I'd be attacked for open transphobia by the TRAs. My group would be dead before it even had a chance to exist.

So, yeah, basically, no trans support group fights the TRA narrative because no trans support group can exist if it fights the TRA narrative. It's frustrating, and I've been trying to find a fault in that circular logic, but so far I'm stumped.

Hoardasurass · 25/01/2026 10:13

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:46

"If they see a man going into the Ladies', they know he's up to no good and can phone the police, round up some help or at the very least warn other women not to go in." Except this is factually untrue. Being up to no good requires intent and action. If a man is in the toilets and waits for his daughter to pee and leave, what is the crime? If a trans woman goes into the toilet, uses it and leaves, what is the crime? That is the issue here, you think it's okay to accuse people of being criminals (predators it seems) purely based on your disapproval of where they are, not on what they do. Which means you don't care about facts. Some gay men have been in the women's toilets with female friends too. Where is the criminal intent?

If a man happens to do something wrong, then that's on him. Not other men. The same would apply if a man did something predatory in the men's room. The criminal activity is the problem. Not what room people are in.

Yes its trespass. Also he is at risk of charges of harassment, voyeurism and/or indecent exposure.
The man hass no right to enter the female facilities and should wait for his daughter outside of the female facilities as you well know.
Now if you've finished squirrel chucking how about you discuss the trans asylum claims

Helleofabore · 25/01/2026 10:00

StormyPotatoes · 25/01/2026 08:07

Why would men need to take their daughters into the women’s toilets if there’s no need for them to be separate sex spaces? Why do trans-identified men need to use the female toilets? Why would any man ever need to go into a woman’s space in that case?

The argument is so garbled. Either there is a need or there isn’t - if you think there’s no need (to you) but women say there are then just leave women’s spaces alone and stay in the men’s.

It is incoherent and inconsistent, yes. The arguments also seem to lack knowledge of history and practical understanding.

However, the arguments we have seen presented seem to be a repeat of what we have seen this month on these threads. Including the bizarre belief that male people are en masse and should be taking small female children into the female toilets.

The lack of safeguarding understanding and the lack of understanding about consent continues to be consistent theme throughout the posts of the last month.

RunningforSam · 25/01/2026 09:59

Helleofabore · 25/01/2026 09:34

I wonder when transgender support groups will start to truly support people with gender identities and stop creating this fear of persecution in any decision that seeks to uphold the needs for society on the basis of sex class. Any group that isn’t publicly saying people with transgender identities are not experiencing genocide, and there are times when sex is important to be prioritised for female people and that male people should not feel it is a personal attack on them when organisations, and society as a whole, does this is feeding this situation.

Those groups have allowed a sub section of extreme transgender rights activists to control the public discussion for too long. We have been told that they are not representative of the larger transgender population. Yet there is no alternative groups out there disrupting this ‘genocide’ and ‘persecution’ discussion.

Of course some people are going to believe that they face genocide and seek asylum. Many of them have said they would do just that, or use language like ‘fleeing’ the USA. And enough people supported and applauded them for saying so.

The fact that they don’t face genocide and that they just aren’t getting their demands fulfilled quite the way they demanded is conveniently ignored. Still, this hyperbolic language has greatly contributed to these men seeking refugee status.

I expect they choose the Nederlands because they all know about the ‘Dutch protocol’ and maybe to them the Nederlands is at the forefront of centring men with transgender identities to get exactly as they want.

100%

Even basic leadership courses teach about exploring one’s narratives, trying to make them as expansive as possible - to enable as many rotes to success as possible.

As long as those leading trans advocacy continue with their myopic focus on success equating to all trans people placed in the sex category of their choosing without question, the quality of life of trans people will continue to suffer.

Many trans people think that not being viewed / treated (by this I mean equal treatment) as the sex they want to be is the primary source of their misery. However, when they receive support for their mental health and start attending school and work, get their housing sorted, make friends and start viewing life through a wider lens, they discover otherwise.

Many TRAs misguidedly believe that all the problems in living that many of those with trans identities have will disappear in a puff of fairy dust if/ when society accepts people can change sex. They don’t recognise the many routes in to having a trans identity and how these intersect with the problems in living experienced.

The idea that the solutions lay outside of trans people is not entirely wrong, just the focus on fucking with sex categories. The solution lays in better mental health care - if this worked well, people with trans identities would be resilient to differing opinions about sex status - housing and employment discrimination etc. People who present as the opposite sex should not be Venice housing and work because of this.

Helleofabore · 25/01/2026 09:34

I wonder when transgender support groups will start to truly support people with gender identities and stop creating this fear of persecution in any decision that seeks to uphold the needs for society on the basis of sex class. Any group that isn’t publicly saying people with transgender identities are not experiencing genocide, and there are times when sex is important to be prioritised for female people and that male people should not feel it is a personal attack on them when organisations, and society as a whole, does this is feeding this situation.

Those groups have allowed a sub section of extreme transgender rights activists to control the public discussion for too long. We have been told that they are not representative of the larger transgender population. Yet there is no alternative groups out there disrupting this ‘genocide’ and ‘persecution’ discussion.

Of course some people are going to believe that they face genocide and seek asylum. Many of them have said they would do just that, or use language like ‘fleeing’ the USA. And enough people supported and applauded them for saying so.

The fact that they don’t face genocide and that they just aren’t getting their demands fulfilled quite the way they demanded is conveniently ignored. Still, this hyperbolic language has greatly contributed to these men seeking refugee status.

I expect they choose the Nederlands because they all know about the ‘Dutch protocol’ and maybe to them the Nederlands is at the forefront of centring men with transgender identities to get exactly as they want.

StormyPotatoes · 25/01/2026 08:07

Why would men need to take their daughters into the women’s toilets if there’s no need for them to be separate sex spaces? Why do trans-identified men need to use the female toilets? Why would any man ever need to go into a woman’s space in that case?

The argument is so garbled. Either there is a need or there isn’t - if you think there’s no need (to you) but women say there are then just leave women’s spaces alone and stay in the men’s.

EmpressaurusKitty · 25/01/2026 06:36

And also that men, however they identify, are not capable of staying out of women’s toilets simply because this is the right thing to do. But Skywinn doesn’t care because this doesn’t affect him.

Namelessnelly · 25/01/2026 05:17

Skywinn · 25/01/2026 00:11

Most men don't use the women's toilets. But in the smaller instances it happens, it doesn't make them predators. Making appeals to the law isn't a good argument, because laws are often stupid.

Also, if you insist that people use the toilets based on sex, then that would result in trans men using the women's room, despite looking like this. If someone who looks like a man is to use the women's restroom, then that would make it all the more easier for men to go in and claim they are actually biologically female, and you wouldn't be able to know either way.

But it's all pointless, given that it doesn't actually matter.

So what you seem to be saying is, either women accept men with a trans identity into female spaces or men pretending to be women with a trans identity will try to enter female spaces? Which begs the question, before males with a trans identity demanded to use female spaces, why did this not happen? No men pretending to be a woman with a trans identity tried to enter female spaces before this whole gender Borg shitshow so I don’t think they’ll suddenly start now.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 25/01/2026 05:15

ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 05:07

It's 3:05pm in the afternoon here in Australia. It's boiling hot so am passing the time in a nice airconditioned house and chilling.

😂 oh right, I forgot about the whole time difference thing the world's got going on. 😂

ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 05:07

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 25/01/2026 04:52

OK, I'm up at stupid o'clock because of sciatica, what's your excuse Black Cat. 😁

It's 3:05pm in the afternoon here in Australia. It's boiling hot so am passing the time in a nice airconditioned house and chilling.

RedToothBrush · 25/01/2026 05:04

OldCrone · 24/01/2026 23:57

@Skywinn
I don't know why people like you are obsessed with toilets.

If you want to discuss toilets, why don't you start your own thread and leave this one for the discussion about Americans seeking asylum in other countries.

All TRA turn discussions to toilets to avoid talking about other issues and they always skirt over the fact that it's not just about safety it's also about privacy and dignity which are protected in UK (and European) law.

I think part of the problem is that women's rights and rights concerning human dignity are an alien concept to Americans. They simply are not part of the cultural landscape, even for Democrat supporters. Not in the way that Europeans view them.

How can you conceive of such concepts with the political landscape and history of the US?

The core of socialism is this concept of human dignity and socialism is regarded with such hostility and suspicion by the entire US political spectrum.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 25/01/2026 04:52

OK, I'm up at stupid o'clock because of sciatica, what's your excuse Black Cat. 😁

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 25/01/2026 04:48

feminine trans women who are attracted to men

Men who are sexually attracted to men are gay men, they're not women and should not be in women's spaces.

Whatever problem men might have with being in men's spaces is for the men to sort out, it's not the function of women to sort out all of men's problems for them. We are not support animals, nor are we a 'safe space' for men. Women don't want men in their spaces, we don't need to explain it nor justify it, us not wanting it is enough.

ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:48

Skywinn · 25/01/2026 00:11

Most men don't use the women's toilets. But in the smaller instances it happens, it doesn't make them predators. Making appeals to the law isn't a good argument, because laws are often stupid.

Also, if you insist that people use the toilets based on sex, then that would result in trans men using the women's room, despite looking like this. If someone who looks like a man is to use the women's restroom, then that would make it all the more easier for men to go in and claim they are actually biologically female, and you wouldn't be able to know either way.

But it's all pointless, given that it doesn't actually matter.

Oh it's been approximately 1.5 days since we've had the photoshop 'what about trans men' test. This has only been addressed 40,000 times on this board over the last 2 years alone! You're not the first, you won't be the last, you're not original. You have no point, and fell flat on your face.

ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:44

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:54

"Society is still sexist." There's sexism for both men and women, and there's countless other types of prejudice too. On the other hand, there are also lots of fickle and petty accusations of prejudice and wrongdoing. Accusing men of being predators because you disapprove of them being in a public toilet is an example of that.

No, accusing a MALE of being in an intimate female only space AUTOMATICALLY makes him a predator!

Transgender Refugees fleeing the USA
ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:41

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:52

How do you safeguard public toilets? They're open doors, literally anyone can go in to either room, any time. If a man is in the women's restroom, and doesn;t commit a crime, what is the issue? Discomfort alone doesn't really cut it, because people are uncomfortable with many things, it's not license to tell people what to do/falsely accuse people of crimes.

By calling the police on the men, and have them charged with Indecent Exposure and/or Voyeurism, like we used to.

And if the filthy fucking predator survived the beating he got from neighbourhood men, he never entered the ladies ever again!

ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:39

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:49

You're making a lot of generalizations on men. Believe it or not, there are going to be many men not interested in you or even thinking about you. This applies even more so if we're talking about feminine trans women who are attracted to men. What does pornhub have to do with any of that?

This is where you men don't even understand your own sex. It's not about attraction. Some men who hate women literally get off on hurting us, having power over us and making us feel uncomfortable. Some men enter female only spaces out of spite, just to see how uncomfortable they make us.

ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:37

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:46

"If they see a man going into the Ladies', they know he's up to no good and can phone the police, round up some help or at the very least warn other women not to go in." Except this is factually untrue. Being up to no good requires intent and action. If a man is in the toilets and waits for his daughter to pee and leave, what is the crime? If a trans woman goes into the toilet, uses it and leaves, what is the crime? That is the issue here, you think it's okay to accuse people of being criminals (predators it seems) purely based on your disapproval of where they are, not on what they do. Which means you don't care about facts. Some gay men have been in the women's toilets with female friends too. Where is the criminal intent?

If a man happens to do something wrong, then that's on him. Not other men. The same would apply if a man did something predatory in the men's room. The criminal activity is the problem. Not what room people are in.

No male has any good intent being in a space where women flee men and where women are vulnerable and in a state of undress. NONE. He is automatically a PREDATOR. And so, btw, is anyone who defends this behaviour.

Transgender Refugees fleeing the USA
ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:34

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:37

I haven't seen any evidence of epidemics of sexual assault in toilets.

Then you haven't paid any attention. Also, on change rooms:

Mixed-gender changing rooms becoming a 'magnet' for sexual predators, according to new report | LBC

Transgender Refugees fleeing the USA
ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:32

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:31

I specified public toilets, but again, given that men and women share nude spaces, I don't really agree with your sentiment, and there are many laws I don't agree with in the first place. You're entitled to feel however you want and be uncomfortable with what you want, but the argument that men commit more sexual crimes is not a sensible argument against men and women being in the same room or even being nude in the same public spaces. These are choices all people are free to make.

given that men and women share nude spaces

No they don't. And even if they did, some being happy with that doesn't make that choice the default. It doesn't mean the choice for female only single sex spaces are taken away for the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of women and girls who want and need our hard won single sex spaces. The choice of one, does not mean all single sex spaces should therefore not exist. The argument that men commit more sexual crimes is THE argument for single sex spaces. Ask any rape survivor, such as myself.

ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:29

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:17

Feeling unsafe and being unsafe are two different things.

Any male in a female only intimate single sex space both is unsafe, and makes females feel unsafe. Now you only joined up today and went straight to the feminism section so it's obvious you're simply trolling to cause trouble and to upset women on here and trauma survivors.

ThatBlackCat · 25/01/2026 04:27

Skywinn · 24/01/2026 23:15

Not for any highly important reason. I don't advocate for anyone to insist they have to use one room over the other, but the fiasco that's been made over it isn't justified, and definitely not to the point where it's okay to accuse people of being predators.

Not for any highly important reason.

Way to show how ignorant and deeply, deeply ill-informed you are. Female only spaces exist to allow females to participate in society. To leave the house. And to have safety, privacy and dignity when we are in a state of undress, miscarrying, changing sanitary products, or fleeing from a man. You ignorance and lack of education on WHY feminism created these spaces is very embarrassing for you.