Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Darlington nurses win their employment tribunal

473 replies

Lovelyview · 16/01/2026 11:43

https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/victory-for-darlington-nurses-as-judge-rules-policy-that-allows-men-into-womens-changing-rooms-is-unlawful-harassment-and-discrimination/

Brilliant news!

Victory for Darlington nurses as Judge rules policy that allows men into women’s changing rooms is unlawful harassment and discrimination - Christian Concern

In a landmark judgment, an Employment Tribunal has ruled that County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust unlawfully discriminated against and harassed the female nurses by requiring them to share female-only changing rooms with a biological male...

https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/victory-for-darlington-nurses-as-judge-rules-policy-that-allows-men-into-womens-changing-rooms-is-unlawful-harassment-and-discrimination/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
nauticant · 16/01/2026 22:43

I'M NOT SURE THAT IF YOU POST IN CAPS IT MAKES THE ARGUMENTS BETTER.

THAT'S JUST MY OPINION THOUGH. MAYBE IT'S REALLY EFFECTIVE SOMETIMES.

ThatCyanCat · 16/01/2026 22:44

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:33

This was my original postJust out of curiosity, which changing room do trans men need to use? Would any females mind a male presenting 'woman' using their changing room and WC?
Where I was clearly asking a simple question, because I had not read the new ruling and did not know if it applied to all trans people. So I am not going on about transmen, it everyone else who insist on referring to my post ( and misunderstanding it) rather than just answering the question.

I answered your question, as did several others. It is very surprising that someone with such a genuine desire for answers, and a superior grasp of English, missed them all.

But I'll answer again. Transmen are women, so by default they can use the ladies', and they can't use the gents', as men have sex based rights too. However, if a transman has modified her body so much that she really, truly passes as a man (very few do), then she can legally be excluded from women's spaces because she would cause the same distress and self exclusion that actual men would cause. It's also acceptable for safeguards to occasionally catch the wrong person. In fact they very often do, usually far more frequently than in the case of passing transmen. We generally accept it when we can't do X or Y for safeguarding reasons and I don't know why so many people think this shouldn't apply when men want in on women's spaces.

This does pose a problem to passing transmen but that's their problem; they chose to make such modifications that they no longer resemble women. Their doctors should discuss this with them before they make these changes.

So there is the answer to your question. You're welcome.

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:45

@murasaki , I will happily read the supreme court ruling, however I erroneously thought it would be quicker and easier to get my question answered on here. Well how wrong was I? Still , it's passed a few hours of my evening.

murasaki · 16/01/2026 22:46

nauticant · 16/01/2026 22:43

I'M NOT SURE THAT IF YOU POST IN CAPS IT MAKES THE ARGUMENTS BETTER.

THAT'S JUST MY OPINION THOUGH. MAYBE IT'S REALLY EFFECTIVE SOMETIMES.

You need the

bigly writing

for maximum effect. Caps just don't cut it these days.

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:51

ThatCyanCat · 16/01/2026 22:44

I answered your question, as did several others. It is very surprising that someone with such a genuine desire for answers, and a superior grasp of English, missed them all.

But I'll answer again. Transmen are women, so by default they can use the ladies', and they can't use the gents', as men have sex based rights too. However, if a transman has modified her body so much that she really, truly passes as a man (very few do), then she can legally be excluded from women's spaces because she would cause the same distress and self exclusion that actual men would cause. It's also acceptable for safeguards to occasionally catch the wrong person. In fact they very often do, usually far more frequently than in the case of passing transmen. We generally accept it when we can't do X or Y for safeguarding reasons and I don't know why so many people think this shouldn't apply when men want in on women's spaces.

This does pose a problem to passing transmen but that's their problem; they chose to make such modifications that they no longer resemble women. Their doctors should discuss this with them before they make these changes.

So there is the answer to your question. You're welcome.

No, instead of answering my question you took deliberate personal stabs at me, making numerous assumptions about me and what I supposedly think. @nauticant, I was using capital letter for the posters who seem unable to read/understand lowercase.

KittyWilkinson · 16/01/2026 22:51

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:45

@murasaki , I will happily read the supreme court ruling, however I erroneously thought it would be quicker and easier to get my question answered on here. Well how wrong was I? Still , it's passed a few hours of my evening.

You've had the answer several times now, but don't seem capable of absorbing it.

murasaki · 16/01/2026 22:54

I'm sure, back when it was all fields around here, that it used to be polite to familiarise oneself with a topic before charging in to announce one's opinion.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/01/2026 22:55

flyingbuttress43 · 16/01/2026 16:25

I happen to be on a sub reddit about a sport - a perfectly civilised group (so it is possible, even on Reddit), then came across the Darlington nurses' decision, and was confronted with the full on circle jerk that is the trans ghetto.

What was hilarious was the number of whinges about the BBC coverage because it has always been so gender critical. Sorry, I fell about laughing.What BBC have these circle jerkers been watching?

Congrats Darlington nurses.👏

One called the Guardian the “Guarditerf” lol lol lol

MrsOvertonsWindow · 16/01/2026 22:55

murasaki · 16/01/2026 22:54

I'm sure, back when it was all fields around here, that it used to be polite to familiarise oneself with a topic before charging in to announce one's opinion.

I think transactivists work to different rules don't they?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/01/2026 22:56

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:45

@murasaki , I will happily read the supreme court ruling, however I erroneously thought it would be quicker and easier to get my question answered on here. Well how wrong was I? Still , it's passed a few hours of my evening.

Go on then, it’s only 88 pages. Chop chop.

murasaki · 16/01/2026 22:56

MrsOvertonsWindow · 16/01/2026 22:55

I think transactivists work to different rules don't they?

It would seem so.

ThatCyanCat · 16/01/2026 22:56

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:51

No, instead of answering my question you took deliberate personal stabs at me, making numerous assumptions about me and what I supposedly think. @nauticant, I was using capital letter for the posters who seem unable to read/understand lowercase.

I'm sorry that the answer wasn't what you wanted, which was obviously, "OH NO WE NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT WHAT ABOUT TRANSMEN YOU ARE RIGHT LET'S GET KNOBS OUT IN THE LADIES' RIGHT AWAY TO PROVE WE ARE GOOD PEOPLE".

You realise that you don't have to do this, though. Clearly you know men aren't women. That's why you started going on about never having had a penis when I referred to you as male. That's why you even understand the concept of a transman and the Transman Gotcha. Once you accept that people can dress and present as they like, they just need to stay out of spaces not for their sex - you know, like absolutely everyone - you no longer have to pretzel yourself and get offended by reality,.

I really do recommend it.

murasaki · 16/01/2026 22:57

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/01/2026 22:56

Go on then, it’s only 88 pages. Chop chop.

If they'd started when it was released, even with a slow reading speed, they'd be done by now.

Seethlaw · 16/01/2026 22:57

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:51

No, instead of answering my question you took deliberate personal stabs at me, making numerous assumptions about me and what I supposedly think. @nauticant, I was using capital letter for the posters who seem unable to read/understand lowercase.

You asked your first question on page 2. You got the answer at the top of page 3:

"They are biological women's so they use the women's. We want to keep mem out of the women's changing rooms not women."

ThatCyanCat · 16/01/2026 22:58

Oh, and I did answer the question at 12.32 today, and just did it again. Don't say I don't do anything for you.

allthingsinmoderation · 16/01/2026 22:58

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 21:49

Jesus, how many times do I have to repeat myself. I was asking if transmen would have to use female changing areas, because I thought this would distress some woman. ( I was using the example of a woman with a 'penis' to explain what could be offensive) I personally do not have, and have never had a penis, or anything pretending to be a penis

Trans men are female and can use the female changing rooms as they have a legal right to do and as they are female they don't pose the same risk to women as males do (therefore the dont instill the same fear) As only 5% of trans men opt for phalloplasty (perfectly understandable given the complication rates and outcomes) and 2% opt for metoidioplasty,the group you refer to would be very small but perhaps a solution would be to provide a third space for those females with body modifications for the comfort of the trans men and for the comfort of women. I third gender neutral spaces for those who wish and consent to them seems a reasonable solution.

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:59

@KittyWilkinson Thanks for the clarity, the uppercase really helped 😃
Yes my question has been answered, but the inability of so many people to not see it as a simple query , but instead insist I had some agenda is astounding.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/01/2026 23:01

Bluemin · 16/01/2026 20:56

A judgment can be a landmark judgment even if it doesn't strictly set precedent. Landmark means that it has significant impact across legal, social or political spheres or clarifies a complex area of law.

A judge saying that there is no legal scope to argue that people can access single sex spaces based on gender identity is a landmark judgment. Particularly the analysis of ECHR rights, and its application of the 1992 Regs and For Women Scotland.

This judgment will have huge practical implications for employers even though it is not binding on other tribunals.

Really interesting, thanks. I guess that’s why the Jaguar Landrover tribunal gets called a “landmark judgment” as supposedly it’s about “non binary” even though it isn’t, really.

ThatCyanCat · 16/01/2026 23:02

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 22:59

@KittyWilkinson Thanks for the clarity, the uppercase really helped 😃
Yes my question has been answered, but the inability of so many people to not see it as a simple query , but instead insist I had some agenda is astounding.

You pulled the Transman Gotcha, ignored the numerous posters who answered it, told us we didn't understand English, flounced, came back, ignored the answers again and still think you're right.

Astounding indeed.

Seethlaw · 16/01/2026 23:05

allthingsinmoderation · 16/01/2026 22:58

Trans men are female and can use the female changing rooms as they have a legal right to do and as they are female they don't pose the same risk to women as males do (therefore the dont instill the same fear) As only 5% of trans men opt for phalloplasty (perfectly understandable given the complication rates and outcomes) and 2% opt for metoidioplasty,the group you refer to would be very small but perhaps a solution would be to provide a third space for those females with body modifications for the comfort of the trans men and for the comfort of women. I third gender neutral spaces for those who wish and consent to them seems a reasonable solution.

Indeed, and I suspect the transman would even be the one asking for some other place to use, before they had to change for the first time.

It's something I noticed back when I was in the community: transmen tend to be very proactive. We anticipate the potential problems and take steps to prevent them. A passing transman in such a situation would very likely want to avoid having to use the women's changing room, both (as you said) for their own and the women's comfort, and so would quietly ask right away for another arrangement to be made.

PurpleReindeer2 · 16/01/2026 23:21

Great news!

KermitTheToad · 16/01/2026 23:23

@ThatCyanCat Still no idea what a Transman Gotcha is, and less idea why 'you' can't give it a rest. I didn't ignore the answer, but I just couldn't ignore the personal attacks so kept coming back to try to understand why there was a need for such vitriol. You clearly have nothing better to do with your time.

murasaki · 16/01/2026 23:26

The transmen gotcha is when bad faith actors introduce the idea of a transman in women's changing rooms. Expecting women to go 'oh no', leaving the transman with nowhere to go. Except most women say, fine, in the women's, as they're biologically female. So it's dropped as soon as it gets a response.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/01/2026 23:28

I can’t imagine a woman who identifies as a man who had genital surgery would be keen to undress fully in front of men, either.

murasaki · 16/01/2026 23:28

And especially dropped when it gets a response from @Seethlaw , as that response doesn't fit the required narrative, despite being from an actual transman.