Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Northern Ireland equality watchdog seeking formal ruling on definition of sex

37 replies

IwantToRetire · 04/12/2025 19:51

The NI Equality Commission is asking the court to clarify how the UK Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Equality Act 2010 in Great Britain should be applied in the different legal context of Northern Ireland, where the 2010 Act does not apply.

The judgment did not consider the particular context of the different legal obligations in Northern Ireland, including Article 2 of the post-Brexit Windsor Framework.

Geraldine McGahey, chief commissioner of the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland, said: “The Commission is obviously not seeking to challenge the Supreme Court’s judgment regarding the interpretation of the Equality Act 2010 in Great Britain.

“Our objective is to secure the greatest possible legal clarity regarding the interpretation of the judgment as it applies in Northern Ireland.”
She continued: “While we recognise that this process delays the Commission from providing guidance for employers, service providers and public authorities, this proactive approach aims to minimise the risks of legal action against them further down the line.

“By seeking clarification from the court at this stage, we aim to avoid prolonged periods of litigation once we provide our advice.

“We believe our approach will enable these contentious issues to be worked through systematically, in a focused manner which respects the diversity of deeply held beliefs and is in the best interests of everyone in Northern Ireland.”

https://www.irishlegal.com/articles/northern-ireland-equality-watchdog-seeking-court-guidance-on-definition-of-sex

Northern Ireland equality watchdog seeking ruling on definition of sex

Northern Ireland's equality watchdog has formally lodged court proceedings seeking clarification on the implications of a landmark UK Supreme Court ruling on transgender rights. The Equality Commission previously said it would ask the Northern Ireland...

https://www.irishlegal.com/articles/northern-ireland-equality-watchdog-seeking-court-guidance-on-definition-of-sex

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
RepurposedArmSkin · 17/05/2026 12:42

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 17/05/2026 12:12

So in essence, they'd really like to find a way out of an inconvenient law that protects women and gay rights to prioritise and privilege a small group of men in abusing these -

but would like to check this thoroughly through court rather than discover through a lot of bloody inconvenient court cases in the next few years that they can't, with all the mess that will involve, and then having to do it the right way anyway.

Great. Save those women and gay people the court cases and stress, get this established.

If people read their submissions you’d see they are an activist organisation pushing their own gender ideology.

They aren’t a neutral party trying to clarify rights. It won’t save women having to sue because the law might be clarified but they won’t comply. The entire women’s sector is captured.

The Commission board is staffed by Rainbow trans rights activists.

I know ultimately the legal action will confirm women are women and men are men in biological terms but we have rights denied for years and still the legal battle to go.

RepurposedArmSkin · 17/05/2026 12:44

AlexandraLeaving · 17/05/2026 11:06

It’s not a daft question to ask the courts to determine what the impact of the WF has on how the wording of the Sex Discrimination Order should be interpreted in light of FWS. It’s not a given that the courts (and ultimately the Supreme Court) would take the view that the NI legislation should be interpreted the same as the GB legislation and therefore legitimate to test it, in the different context.

But equally for those advocating that the WF means NI legislation will have to be interpreted to treat TW as women, they might be disappointed to see how the courts view the matter. It would surely depend on them being able to provide that pre-Brexit the SDO would have “correctly” been interpreted as TWAW, and the logic in FWS is that IF certified sex is what counts then in effect you have no sex discrimination protection, which would have rendered the SDO nugatory and pointless, therefore that proves the SDO ought always to have been interpreted as meaning biological sex in line with FWS.

I’m not expressing myself very well, sorry. I think it is important to have a court ruling on this, and important that the courts have access to high quality arguments from the likes of Ben Cooper and Naomi Cunningham.

Not sure how it’s not a given.

Reading FWS and the relevant legislation means it’s a given.

It’s 1970s legislation. Trans wasn’t in the legislators minds.

AlexandraLeaving · 17/05/2026 12:46

RepurposedArmSkin · 17/05/2026 12:38

It is daft for this body to ask.

Because it’s plain when you map across the SDA 1975 to SDO 1976 it’s a cut and paste job.

FWS was clear in SDA man and women meant biological sex.

The ECNI needs to advise on the law. They get it wrong they get sued.

They don’t go clamoring for EU rights that don’t exist - massive overreach.

Show quote history

I have not looked at anything more recent but their initial proposal to seek a judicial construction of the law was couched in fairly neutral terms about seeking clarification of the impact (if any) of the WF.

RepurposedArmSkin · 17/05/2026 13:17

AlexandraLeaving · 17/05/2026 12:46

I have not looked at anything more recent but their initial proposal to seek a judicial construction of the law was couched in fairly neutral terms about seeking clarification of the impact (if any) of the WF.

Show quote history

There’s a lot more in other papers and 25 years of fudging and activism.

They want self ID and recognition for ‘intersex’ people. Except that’s so offensive to those with DSD and if they mean non-binary I don’t think NBs would like being called intersex.

Progressive in an embarrassing way.

UtopiaPlanitia · 17/05/2026 20:17

RepurposedArmSkin · 17/05/2026 13:17

There’s a lot more in other papers and 25 years of fudging and activism.

They want self ID and recognition for ‘intersex’ people. Except that’s so offensive to those with DSD and if they mean non-binary I don’t think NBs would like being called intersex.

Progressive in an embarrassing way.

Show quote history

Progressive in an embarrassing way.

Sure, that’s how it’s done over here. Our provincial elite/media class is always imitating the big boys & girls in London but never getting it quite right.

RepurposedArmSkin · 17/05/2026 21:35

UtopiaPlanitia · 17/05/2026 20:17

Progressive in an embarrassing way.

Sure, that’s how it’s done over here. Our provincial elite/media class is always imitating the big boys & girls in London but never getting it quite right.

Show quote history

They can’t even copy and paste the legislation right - it’s always a year or two late with an additional twist.

Ie the cash for fuel scandal. Argh! 😖

Original poster
IwantToRetire · 17/05/2026 23:02

I've just been reading this to try and remember what has been happening - or not happening
https://www.lewissilkin.com/insights/2025/07/03/does-the-for-women-apply-to-northern-ireland-the-equality-commission-for-ni-releases-guidance

Were the results of the consultation ever published?

Does the ‘For Women Scotland’ ruling apply to Northern Ireland? The Equality Commission for NI releases guidance

The recent UK Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers has had significant implications for equality law, but its effect in Northern Ireland remains uncertain. Last week, the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland publi...

https://www.lewissilkin.com/insights/2025/07/03/does-the-for-women-apply-to-northern-ireland-the-equality-commission-for-ni-releases-guidance

OP posts:
RepurposedArmSkin · 17/05/2026 23:15

https://equalityni.org/our-work/news/ecni-seeks-high-courts-advice-on-supreme-court-judgment

In December ECNI said

The Equality Commission has formally applied to the High Court for leave to apply for judicial review following the Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of ‘For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers’.

So assume its coming up this year.

Lewis Silkin confirms that position. I wonder how we'd find out - ECNI maybe?

AlexandraLeaving · 18/05/2026 09:45

The latest on the ECNi website says there was a case management hearing on 27 January at which it was decided the leave hearing would wait until after the judgment in Dillon was published (obviously it now has been) and the next scheduled hearing would be 1 June, presumably that would be the permission/leave to proceed hearing, though I guess the courts could decide to do a wrapped up leave and decision hearing if it felt it had enough information to do so.

UtopiaPlanitia · 18/05/2026 17:38

New article from Newsletter today with quote from Sex Matters:

https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/courts/eu-intervening-hungary-style-on-trans-matters-now-less-likely-after-windsor-framework-judgment-8550682

http://archive.today/v8zrv

Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns for the charity Sex Matters, which is critical of transgenderism, cautioned against “reading too much” into the CJEU judgment against Hungary.

"The European court has ruled that Hungary cannot ban the promotion of transgender identities to under 18s, but it says nothing about single-sex spaces, or about the rights of other people,” she said.

"The Windsor Framework says there should be no diminution of human rights for people in Northern Ireland as a result of the UK leaving the EU.

That isn’t just about people who claim a transgender identity.

"It applies to everyone, and it matters especially to women and girls.
"If a man can say he is a woman and access female-only spaces, then women lose privacy, dignity and safety.

"The Equality Commission for Northern Ireland needs to do its job and declare that the only lawful way to provide single-sex spaces, services and sports is on the basis of biological sex, not claimed identity.

"This is what the Supreme Court ruled a year ago, and it’s perfectly in line with European law."

MyShyCat · Today 21:48

RepurposedArmSkin · 16/05/2026 16:43

The ECNI is supposed to offer guidance on the law in NI.

For years they’ve been an activist organisation substituting gender for sex and acting like trans identitfied people have rights they never had and advocating for self ID.

There is no Equality Act 2010 here. Just Sex Discrimination Order 1976. Since it’s almost word for word the same as SDA 1975 according to FWS that’s means man woman and sex and needs to be interpreted according to meaning at time.

A few bits about gender reassignment were added in 2004 post Goodwin. So that’s the basics.

Twenty years on ECNI say oh we want our 1976 law to actually allow for self ID and mean men can become women. Let’s ask a lower court to confirm that. We can wave the magic wand of Windsor framework about which means we need to keep pace with EU law.

Except SC says in Dillon, Windsor doesn’t give you an EU buffet of rights. You have what you have.

It’s a try on and waste of money. But sure that’s how the trans right activists work. Break the law and be state funded to do so.

Bloody hell. Everyday is a school day. Didn't know that the Equality Act doesn't apply in the North. Finally might have an an excuse never to move back to Belfast! (Besides Devon does have the added advantage of Clotted Cream Teas!) Are there actually any political parties in the North who are sympathic to Womens Rights?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page