There are people on this board who have faced this directly and will be able to talk more authoratively.
It is important to remember that for families who faced the situation a few years ago, there was very little good advice about how to manage it.
The "dead child vs alive opposite gender child" trope was alive and well. Teachers and mental health professionals were overwhelmingly affirmative although I think this is actually quite slow to change.
It was really really hard to take any other course than affirm. I know of someone threatened with SS intervention for not buying her child a breastbinder. Person threatening the referral had no idea that breast binding was harmful when the parent pushed back on why she hadn't done it. As an aside this is why I will never again buy anything from Lush as they were supplying binders to children behind their parents backs.
In genral, the lack of evidence for intervention and the lack of concern about that lack of evidence or proof of safety for "treatment" is jawdropping.
I think for parents facing this now there is more information, there is Cass, the Bayswater group are more widely known and the whole social discourse aroudn sex and gender is different. We can now categorically say you don't change sex biologically or legally. Even prior to FWS that was disputed.
Knowing all that I know my first thought on reading the article was that Richard was lucky he didn't end up in a mess with the school referring for emotional neglect because of failure to affirm.
Also it must be hard/ impossible to accept that actions you took with the best intention in mind have harmed your child. We all know the trans-relative phenomenon is one of the drivers for this movement - fox killer, Dr Who, ??PM, half of Hollywood etc.