More threats of disruption from TRAs

[Hoardasurass]

I posted this on the Susan Smith thread but think it needs a thread of its own.
https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/mask-wearing-trans-activists-plot-36147260?utm_source=linkCopy&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar
What are the chances of the police actually doing their job this time instead of kettling us as police Scotland did before or allowing men to disruption the protest with noise.like.last time and the victim blaming

"What are the chances...?"

Not great looking at past experiences.

Keep at it lads, you're peaking everyone who sees your bullying of women.

Police Scotland are also coming under increasing scrutiny for their one-sided policing. So even if they let the TRAs drown out women’s speeches, that also tells a reportable story where those responsible have to account for their actions.

I'm in the US so I'm not afraid to say out loud what I think a lot of people across the pond are thinking. It's high time the Scottish police are investigated for bribery. There can be no other explanation as to why they continue to not only flout their duties and free speech laws but to openly protect those who enthusiasticly break the law, intimidate, bully, and commit acts of vandalism and violence. The Supreme Court has spoken and yet this "law enforcement" agency continues to do anything but. I'd like to see bank accounts of both the institution and individuals in high level positions to determine if money is involved. There can be no other explanation - the coordinated effort of the Scottish police to protect criminals and flout the law is nothing short of criminal itself.

Funny how the women protesting that Scot Gov must follow the law never feel the need to cover their faces, despite being the ones against whom threats and malicious accusations are made. If the Mens’ Wants activists are so certain of the justice, integrity and truth of their position, why do they feel the need to hide their faces? Why do they feel it so important not to share their manifesto with the press?

Maybe not outright bribery. We've speculated before about membership of the freemasons and other male-only secret societies. Brothers, buddies, whatever, looking after each other. Same sort of questions as were asked about Thomas Hamilton. Loyalty metastasising.

I was interested that JKR used masonic support and protection as an element in her most recent book.

There's already a thread about this trying to publicise the event, and has this article included.

Would be good to use that thread as it is about helping women get involved and not be intimidated by men.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5424501-199-days-later-national-day-of-action

I'm not sure that bribery is necessary, being 100% captured by genderwoo is probably enough🙄 - I'm reminded of the famous lines by Humbert Wolfe:
You cannot hope to bribe or twist
(thank God!) the British journalist.
But, seeing what the man will do
unbribed, there's no occasion to.

Given the fetishistic behaviours and proclivities of many within the GI ideology family, I would not be surprised if extremely high-ranking persons (eg in police forces, unions, government, councils, media, health/medical organisations, etc) have certain lifestyle choices they do not want revealed to the population at large….