Grokipedia.com version 0.1 is now live. Efforts to replace wikipedia with a less biased root source for the world.

[SingleSexSpacesInSchools]

https://grokipedia.com/page/Transgender_rights_in_the_United_Kingdom

For example, the above.

Whatever people think about Elon, underestimating him is never a good idea.

Yeah but a dude in the ladies does deserve to be punched in the balls IMO

None of them.

IMHO, Nazis posting white supremicist great replacement rubbish and more can legitimately be called Nazis. Before EM they got banned. No longer in the cess pit of a forum.

Amen. These tech bros are a danger to women, musk is simply trying to take down the one who hates us less.

Is it a full moon because all the loonies are out in force. 🤣

This new encyclopedia is simply marvellous: https://grokipedia.com/page/Vladimir_Putin#2022-ukraine-operation-objectives-execution-and-global-repercussions manages to excuse Russia invading Ukraine, shedding that ridiculous bias of expecting sovereign states to be able to make their own decisions about their own country.

Or maybe it's as reliable as one of EMs exploding cars...

Um, his proven incompetency & corruption is unrelated to whether I personally 'like' him.

You are only as good as your last achievement of which was the monumental disaster that was Doge. And it's not just that he achieved the opposite of what he said he would do but that he achieved his intention at destroying any regulatory checks on his businesses. That you can seriously consider this person as a trustworthy source of information after this shameless assault on checks & balances not to mention flooding X with algorithmic propaganda then I have a bridge to sell you.

The willingness to look the other way by GCs as their 'allies' burn civilisation down ought to give anyone with half a brain cell pause about their true nature.

truly the worlds richest person, who reduced the cost to orbit by a factor of 20, created the electric car market, rebuilt X as an actual free speech bastion, got Trump elected and by doing so had the largest effect on the fight back against transgender nonsense - is incompetent.

Thats before you notice he's the only person who has made any headway getting the species interplanetary. what a big fat failure.

You can hate him as much as you like but he's succeeded far and beyond you (and me)

Elon Musk's most recent major achievement, as of October 28, 2025, was becoming the first person in history to reach a net worth exceeding $500 billion on October 1, 2025

@PollyNomial @Howseitgoin are you a double team on the sofa together or just one guy watching chaturbate in one corner and Edge and Chrome open at the same time with one mumsnet account logged in in each of them?

"who reduced the cost to orbit by a factor of 20, created the electric car market"

Perspective matters.

Musk's 300 odd million campaign dollars & support on X effectively ushered in a climate change denier who immediately went to work smashing down all climate change progress including the subsidies for electric cars that largely contributed to Tesla's collapse.

"rebuilt X as an actual free speech bastion"

For a market place ideas to function, ideas need to be heard of which Musk's algorithmic controls easily stifled.

"got Trump elected and by doing so had the largest effect on the fight back against transgender nonsense - is incompetent."

There's this thing called 'the 3 branches of government' in the US one of which is the judiciary that Trump has been losing to hand over fist including for trans issues. Executive orders don't mean a thing if they can't stand up in court.

"Thats before you notice he's the only person who has made any headway getting the species interplanetary"

Lol, a fool & his money are soon parted…
The idea that interplanetary travel is a priority let alone even ranks as an issue is for those drunk on ketamine kool aid…

Is it like gogglebox on your sofa, except you're both angry and sad?

Everything I said is true, I don't care if you like it or not xxx

His AI sex bots that he thinks are going to help repopulate the planet and actually train men how to date...the settings for your girlfriend are submissive or super-submissive.

Lord knows I have my reservations about Elon, but I love that for the FWR lefties, it's not enough to have specific reservations about Elon, one has to loudly and demonstratively denounce everything that's even vaguely associated with him, like as if he were the devil himself.

These are often the same people who refuse to distance themselves from Martin James Smith and his associates. Funny old world.

Gotta hand it Musk & the billionaire class tho, they correctly calculate there's always an endless supply of fawning fanboy/girl minions willing to cuck themselves on behalf of the 'rightful' ruling class…

Yet again, Howie is unable to avoid displaying his misogyny.

Nice one, pal. You never disappoint us.

"his"

If only you could comprehend the misogyny in your own assumptions…

Musk is a thin-skinned bully, a charlatan with deep pockets, who likes to take credit for others' work. Like he didn't found Tesla but likes to pretend he did.

That said, I feel like Grokipedia may be an interesting application of AI but from browsing a few pages it looks to be mostly based on Wikipedia, except with less visibility into how each page has been written. So really what is the point.

Fascinating, though very long, article about how one Wiki admin has been gaming the site rules and processes for years to promote his personal agendas. Especially revealing on how the requirement for Reliable Sources and references that should keep contributors honest can itself be manipulated.

Written by an ex-Mormon furry no less, and no the worse for it.

www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/reliable-sources-how-wikipedia-admin

Larry Sanger, one of the founders of Wikipedia, has been banging on about this for years, and in particular how the "reliable sources" requirement was snuck in the back door.

That means, for UK stories, the BBC and the Guardian. The Times might be used with caution, the Telegraph with even more caution, and the Mail is totally blacklisted and may not be used at all.

Oh, and Pink News is a reliable source!

That means, if there's a scandal in the UK and the BBC and Guardian are not covering it, as far as Wikipedia is concerned it never happened. Which is important because of how often lazy journalists rely on Wikipedia.

Personally, I'll still use Wikipedia for questions like "what is the population of Mogadishu", but it's worse than useless for any issue of even slight political or cultural controversy. I stopped being an editor years ago, but once you've seen the back end, the bullying cliques of activist editors with bias on full display, you don't ever forget it.

Accuracy. Less bias.

See you lose any argument by using the term “cuck”.

It'll still be biased, differently to Wikipedia, but there'll be no Talk pages or page history to browse through to get a feel for what's been left out. AI is always bullshitting in conversations, I don't see why this would be different tbh.

Because I looked at about ten pages on both and compared them. Graham linehan was a good one. As was Mumsnet.

Ignoring the frothing at the mouth EM seems to provoke in the woke, Wikipedia has been a source of mockery for being a reliable source of knowledge since the beginning. Recently it's become just a parody of knowledge so a new attempt to create an online reference tool is interesting. However Large Language Models are in their infancy and are not as good as the investors in them would like us to believe so it remains too be seen whether this one is any better. It's always good to have an alternative though, maybe the competition will lead to an improvement in both.

I find the Talk pages quite entertaining.