JB's claim (no collaboration, no screenshot or archive, just her own word) was published by a site called unherd who of course went for max manipulation points by posting it along with a photo of a crying woman holding a girl. They know their target audience- people who are easily manipulated and don't care about facts or fact checking.
PH seems to be the porn site people like to try and sling mud at the most, perhaps because it's the most well known one. However compared to many lesser-known porn sites PH is actually one of the most secure in terms of safeguarding:
-Only verified users can upload videos
-All videos by non-verified users have been removed
-Has a blacklist of words (yes this includes words like war and r*pe) that if a search includes any of them it will not attempt to perform the search and take the user to a specific page warning them the search may potentially be illegal. see image.
-Complies with the UK's online safety bill
-Progress with PH and some of the other most well known porn sites are being made still, with the sites now rolling out requiring proof of ID and consent of everyone appearing in every video.
You certainly can't say that about all porn sites (and thanks to the online safety bill, people who want to look at porn who don't have a VPN or want to verify their age will just end up on a lesser known and more dodgy porn site).
Two images attached.