The victim has been posting on social media. I suspect that this is not a good idea, given that the trial has not taken place. (Perhaps I should be using the phrase 'alleged victim' for legal reasons?)
She has stated that her practice stopped paying her when she couldn't return to work, but that it was paying her attacker. Now that he's been charged, that may not be the case.
I'm assuming that she turned to social media in desperation. She is no longer anonymous, while the alleged perpetrator is.